AI Rate Professor

Medicine

Bernadette Newland

CODING455 · MEDA164 · MEDA140 · MEDA484 · HSCI484 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate messy organization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized CanvasMandatory attendanceNice but averageSelf-study heavyTest focused
  • Students repeatedly call and course structure.
  • Attendance and participation are often mandatory, including surprise Zoom sessions for supposedly online classes.
  • Content is not intellectually brutal, but and test prep.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty ratings are low, but organization problems and and showing up.

One online A grade exists; and self-teaching than free As.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Material is mostly terms, coding, and medical basics rather than advanced theory, though lecture support is weak.

Both formats describe easy-to-moderate content undermined by poor organization.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and participation count, including mandatory Zoom for sections listed as online.

Online and ; and you will not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and most detailed comments warn about disorganization and disappointing delivery.

Recommendation is weak in both formats; but still mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

as harsh, but tests dominate and .

Format shift

Online notes graded by few things; .

Workload

Light

58/100

Homework volume is modest, but reading and .

Format shift

; overall load is still lighter than heavy writing classes.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Students say she is kind and , and mishandles Canvas and course logistics.

Format shift

The single online review mirrors the in-person organization complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests every couple of weeks and .

Format shift

In-person comments are the main evidence; online says graded by few things.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person and hybrid-style feedback , and test-centered grades.

Main concern

as online or light, plus weak lecture support.

What students said

“Don't get me wrong, Professor Newland is a nice professor, but .”
HSCI484
“She has scheduled zoom meetings for a class that is supposed to be totally online.”
MEDA484
“ , so study the terms outside of class to pass.”
HSCI484

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The online reviewer found her caring but and .

Main concern

, and long low-value class meetings.

What students said

“She's a nice person, but very disorganized. She knows the material, but Canvas, and blames Canvas for everything.”
MEDA164

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and ; reviews do not clearly describe proctoring or open-book policies.

Frequent testsTerm memorizationHomework not collected

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and term-heavy study with limited homework review.

Test every two weeksStudy terms outside class
“ , so study the terms outside of class to pass.”
HSCI484
“There is a and she doesn't go over the coding as much as you would want her to.”
CODING455

Online

Online evidence does not clearly describe .

Graded by few things
“She's also a .”
MEDA164

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't get me wrong, Professor Newland is a nice professor, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews (1 online, 7 in , and self-study testing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🧩 Organization Issues

30/100

“ . Not straightforward at all.”

📍 Mandatory Presence

22/100

“she has scheduled Zoom meetings that are surprisingly mandatory because .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“she doesn't really lecture. I don't feel like I am prepared for the medical field but I studied from the material she gave us by myself.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“Very disappointing first impression.”

Theme 1

🗂️ About Organization

  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Learning Style

  • she doesn't really lecture
  • , so study the terms outside of class to pass.
  • There's LOTS of reading and if you don't read the book you wont know how to code

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a nice person
  • Newland is a sweet person but average professor.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews across 2015-2022 are consistent on disorganization and , but the sample is small and some grades are still pending.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MEDA4843 reviews
HSCI4842 reviews
CODING4551 review
MEDA1401 review
MEDA1641 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3