AI Rate Professor

Health Science

Monica Franciosa

MEDA415 · MEDIA415 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

you will teach yourself law and ethics with little faculty support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsentee Online InstructorUnorganized ChaosUnresponsive EmailsSelf-Taught RequiredAvoid Online Sections
  • Every review rates teaching quality at the absolute bottom with
  • Students describe missing instruction, confusing syllabus, ignored emails, and copy-pasted materials
  • Workload can spike with many quizzes and essays while guidance is nearly absent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Multiple incompletes and chaos mean grades collapse when structure and because content is elite.

Almost all grade-risk evidence is from online MEDA415 reviews; the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty ratings are low on average, but students still struggle because materials and guidance are missing rather than concepts being advanced.

Online reviews dominate; one online student called the .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

as not mandatory, which fits an absentee, online-first delivery pattern.

Online and the as non-mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and every comment is a warning about unresponsiveness and zero teaching presence.

and one in-person review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report incompletes, blame-shifting, and .

Format shift

reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

At least one detailed report of 17-26 quizzes weekly plus essays and .

Format shift

; in-person review has no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students say she is absent, unorganized, unresponsive, copy-pastes materials, and forces self-teaching.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the full disaster narrative; in-person only echoes absenteeism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Quizzes, essays, discussions, and self-directed reading dominate with almost no guided lecture support.

Format shift

Assessment detail is online-only; a .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

professor with no redeeming detail.

Main concern

Apparent absence even when not labeled online.

What students said

“Absentee Professsor...”
MEDA415

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online MEDA415 students report total disorganization, unhelpful or , and .

Main concern

No reliable instruction, delayed or condescending communication, and incomplete grades.

What students said

“It's as if Monica is never there. She is very unhelpful, makes you look for , and .”
MEDA415
“Monica has no structure, no organization, and no consistency when it comes to the class.”
MEDA415
“17-26quizzes a . and discussions. Very condescending if you ask a question.”
MEDIA415

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and , which is unfriendly even if not heavily proctored.

Self-taught readingQuiz barrageEssay questionsMidterm with no review

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Students mention a , essays, and discussions while told to just read the book.

Many weekly quizzesEssays and discussionsMidterm without reviewRead the book
“Never had a class with her until 3 days prior to midterm and we never ended up going over any material. Told to just read the book.”
MEDIA415
“17-26quizzes a . and discussions.”
MEDIA415

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Prepare to teach yourself about law.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (5 online, 1 in person), highlighting absentee teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Teaching Presence

8/100

“It's as if Monica is never there. She is very unhelpful, makes you look for , and .”

📉 Organization Collapse

10/100

“Monica has no structure, no organization, and no consistency when it comes to the class.”

📧 Communication Failure

12/100

“Monica was unresponsive for the most part when emailed, and when she did email, her responses were normally unhelpful or had attitude.”

⚠️ Recommendation

5/100

“if you're taking an online class with her, you have been warned.”

Theme 1

👻 About Presence & Support

  • Absentee Professsor...
  • emails/answers consist of "read the syllabus"

Theme 2

📚 About Course Design

  • Everything Monica does for this class is copy/pasted from someone else
  • Told to just read the book.
  • Prepare to teach yourself about law.

Theme 3

💢

  • Very condescending if you ask a question.
  • pushes blame to the students for their own shortcomings.
  • Makes you feel like your the idiot when she

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Only six reviews, all from the same day cluster in 2020, but they are highly detailed and completely consistent in negativity.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MEDA4155 reviews
MEDIA4151 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 3