AI Rate Professor

Music

Robert Millar

MUS202 · MUS204 · MUS250 · MUS100 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already know music theory well and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh ExpectationsIntro Level OverloadUnclear StandardsHeavy Online WorkTough Grader
  • Many students say intro music courses assume advanced knowledge and grade harshly.
  • Weekly forums, tests, and .
  • A minority found OnMusic courses manageable if they completed tedious weekly work carefully.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

, and heavy weekly work make As rare except for highly prepared students.

Most evidence is online; the .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Intro courses demand professional-level music knowledge and high volume of tests and essays.

Online and as far too advanced.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation and weekly forums matter, and .

Online reviews stress participation and weekly posts more than seat time.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Majority call him terrible or a mistake for intro students despite a couple tolerable online experiences.

Online is mixed but still often negative; the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students and little help when they raise concerns.

Format shift

and the one in-person review.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

High weekly workload with many online tests, essays, forums, and concert requirements.

Format shift

Online workload details dominate; .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Support is widely described as unhelpful, with and mismatched quizzes.

Format shift

Online complaints of unhelpfulness are strongest; in-person also reports poor fit for intro level.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Mix of online tests, weekly forums, essays, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide almost all assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review describes an intro course overloaded with advanced expectations and .

Main concern

Expects mastery of reading and composing music in a 100-level class.

What students said

“He has and expects you to be a master of the material for a 100 level intro class.”
MUS100

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online music courses use OnMusic sites with daily or , and concert attendance, with mixed ease but frequent harsh-expectation complaints.

Main concern

and quizzes that .

What students said

“GRADES YOU HARSHLY WITHOUT STATING HIS EXTENSIVE EXPECTATIONS FOR HIS ASSIGNMENTS.”
MUS204
“ knowledge. Are you kidding me? Is it foundation music??!”
MUS100
“As long as you give insightful responses to his weekly forum postings and put in the required amount of words for the .”
MUS250

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment relies on frequent online quizzes and written work; reviews .

Many online quizzes/testsWeekly forumsEssaysConcert attendance

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The harsh advanced expectations and heavy assignments.

Heavy assignmentsAdvanced intro expectations
“expects you to be a master of the material for a 100 level intro class.”
MUS100

Online

, and concert attendance; quizzes often feel harder than course materials.

OnMusic quizzesWeekly forumsEssaysConcert attendance
“I did 27 on-line tests, and 5 essays(350 words).”
MUS100
“ .”
MUS204
“ , and light weight for extra forum posts.”
MUS202

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“GRADES YOU HARSHLY WITHOUT STATING HIS EXTENSIVE EXPECTATIONS FOR HIS ASSIGNMENTS. HIGH WEEKLY WORKLOAD, EXPECTS YOU TO KNOW EVERYTHING ABOUT MUSIC IN AN INTRO CLASS.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews (4 online, 1 in person), highlighting harsh intro expectations and mixed online tedium. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️

18/100

“GRADES YOU HARSHLY WITHOUT STATING HIS EXTENSIVE EXPECTATIONS FOR HIS ASSIGNMENTS.”

🧠 Intro Level Overreach

24/100

“ knowledge. Are you kidding me? Is it foundation music??!”

📚 Tedious But Doable Path

45/100

“the class is fairly easy, just tedious.”

👎 Overall Recommendation

28/100

“The most terrible professor I have met in my 23 years life.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • expects you to be a master of the material for a 100 level intro class
  • GRADES YOU HARSHLY WITHOUT STATING HIS EXTENSIVE EXPECTATIONS
  • He assumes that you are the next Beethoven!

Theme 2

💻 About Online Work

  • OnMusic website for the course is easy to navigate
  • I did 27 on-line tests, and 5 essays

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • SUPER UNHELPFUL EVEN WHEN U INFORM HIM OF YOUR CONCERNS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, mostly online and somewhat older, with polarized outcomes and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MUS1002 reviews
MUS2021 review
MUS2041 review
MUS2501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D- 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1