AI Rate Professor

Music

Kymberly Jackson

MUS276 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Skip her MUS276 section; reviews show low trust in professionalism and support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderRudeUnprofessionalMandatory attendanceTalks down to students
  • .
  • She is described as impolite, unresponsive to emails, and personal-rant heavy.
  • and expectations feel high for a music course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tagged as a get email responses.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Difficulty is mid-range overall, but students say expectations feel too high for a music class.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and warn that skipping hurts your chance to pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students label her a and say rewrite chances are not honored in practice.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Papers and reading matter, but comments focus more on tone and absences than sheer volume.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Reviews cite unprofessional rants, talking down to students, and multiple absences during summer.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Comments highlight papers and rewrites more than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MUS276 reviews cluster around rude tone, high expectations, and poor responsiveness.

Main concern

Unprofessional behavior, ignored rewrite emails, and .

What students said

“ .”
MUS276
“Impolite, and unprofessional.”
MUS276
“Talks down on students constantly.”
MUS276

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment discussion centers on papers and notes.

Paper rewrites offered

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews mention paper rewrite offers and book/note study but .

Paper-based workRewrite opportunity claimed
“Says that she offers the but .”
MUS276
“Read the books and . Ask questions.”
MUS276

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Says that she offers the opportunity to rewrite papers but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting professionalism and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Both rude and unqualified to teach.”

👎 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“ .”

📧

28/100

“ ”

Theme 1

😠 About Professionalism

  • Impolite, and unprofessional
  • Talks down on students constantly
  • Goes on rants about her personal life

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Expectations on students are too high especially for a music class
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent in-person reviews over several years give a .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUS2764 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1