AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Daniel Ming

AUTO706 · AUTO728 · SUS520 · NOTTTEN · AUTO721 · AUTO790 · AUTO · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you are already strong in auto tech and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPuts Students DownUnstructured LabsTough TestsHard to Ask QuestionsAttendance Matters
  • Many students say he knows the trade but teaches poorly and shuts down questions.
  • and tests are described as tough.
  • A few motivated students do fine if they apply themselves without hand-holding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tags and , and little hand-holding, so an A takes real effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Average difficulty is mid-high and students describe .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and tags say skip class and you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

, but many urge others not to take his classes due to poor teaching and disrespect.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tagged as a and few graded items, unforgiving if you do not apply yourself.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Labs and participation matter with , but workload intensity is mixed rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Some praise technical skill, but , and dismissive when students ask for help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Graded by few things with and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person auto labs and lectures draw polarized reviews: some call him knowledgeable and fair if you work hard, while many say , and help is hard to get.

Main concern

, and tough tests with little support.

What students said

“asking him a question isn't a good thing unless your classmates doesn't know the ”
AUTO721
“he thinks that he is some kind of automotive god and put students down”
AUTO706
“If you're willing to work hard, and ”
AUTO721

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as tough with limited graded items; .

Tough TestsFew Graded ItemsIn-Person Labs

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person auto courses stress tough tests, participation, and labs; reviews .

Tough TestsParticipation MattersUnstructured Labs
“ ”
AUTO721
“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”
AUTO721

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! hope he leaves soon.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews spanning 2003-2017, highlighting conflict between technical skill and poor teaching tone. Credibility rating: Medium.

👨‍🏫 Teaching Quality

30/100

“dont get me wrong hes a good technician and knows what hes talking about. but hes a bad teacher. puts you down.”

👎 Student Respect

25/100

“treats students with no respect, calling them bullsh*ters, or just making them feel plain stupid”

🛠️ For Self-Driven Students

40/100

“If you're willing to work hard, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Asking him a .
  • and you will
  • the times

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Can be very unforgiving for those who don't apply themselves
  • Skip class? You won't pass.

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • he thinks that he is some kind of automotive god and put students down
  • always thinks he's right, stubborn, always hungry
  • always talk dirty. always talk about his son

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen mostly older in-person reviews show consistent conflict about teaching quality, but sparse grades and many vague early comments limit confidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 54

Course coverage

AUTO7214 reviews
20062 reviews
AUTO2 reviews
AUTO7061 review
AUTO7281 review
Show 3 more courses
AUTO7901 review
NOTTTEN1 review
SUS5201 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values