Najla Abrao

MATH200 · ELEMENTARYALG · MATH110 · MATH123 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 72/100
RMP rating: 4.6/5
Take again: 50%
Difficulty: 2.2

The decision

Strong pick for lower-level math if you attend and do the work, but approach higher sections carefully given the failing-class report.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient ExplainerCheat Sheet AllowedPosts Answers OnlineRepetitive But EffectiveMixed Class Outcomes

Most students praise her patience, positive attitude, and .
Cheat sheets and sample-like tests help in lower-level math for engaged students.
One high-visibility review claims roughly 80% of a MATH123 section failed, creating real caution.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Lower courses can feel like an easy A with homework and attendance, but and one section outcome was brutal.

; no online reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Material is often described as manageable and repetitive, though difficulty jumps hard when students fall behind.

; no online reviews available.

Is attendance flexible?

Depends

58/100

Many call her one of the , but a 50% take-again rate and a mass-fail report create real hesitation.

; no online reviews available.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, yet one cohort experienced widespread failure with .

Format shift

Workload

Light

72/100

, and study for tests; not described as overwhelming when students keep pace.

Format shift

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Patient, positive, and clear for most students, with .

Format shift

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and finals supported by sample tests.

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person math with , and fair tests when students stay engaged.

Main concern

At least one section reportedly had a very high fail rate with .

What students said

“she allows a cheat sheet front and back for the tests. the and fair; its almost similar to the sample tests.”
MATH200

“She failed eighty percent of the 2016 Spring class that I was in.”
MATH123

“ and does not judge you by your mathematic ability.”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests often mirror samples and allow a front-and-back cheat sheet, though outcomes .

Cheat Sheet AllowedSample TestsFair Exam FormatIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

74/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sample-test similarity for prepared students.

Cheat Sheet AllowedSample TestsFair Exam Format

“she allows a cheat sheet front and back for the tests. the and fair; its almost similar to the sample tests.”
MATH200

“ , and notes are posted on webaccess.”
MATH123

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“she's one awesome professor with a positive and upbeat attitude. shes repetitive but it helps with info being stuck in your head.”
Voice snapshots generated from 7 in-person reviews, balancing strong praise with one severe fail-rate complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Patient Teaching

78/100

“ and does not judge you by your mathematic ability.”

⚠️ Class Fail Risk

35/100

“She failed eighty percent of the 2016 Spring class that I was in.”

📝 Resource Support

80/100

“homework and the . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

positive and upbeat attitude
doesn't judge you and wants you to ask questions
funny

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

easy A but just because it is an easy class
if you dont come to class
If most of the class is failing, maybe it isn't the students

Theme 3

🧰 About Resources

Posts answers online so that helps as well
allows a cheat sheet front and back for the tests
, and notes are posted on webaccess

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Only 7 reviews with mostly aligned praise but one severe outlier; limited grade data and older dates lower confidence.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55

4 out of 51

3 out of 51

2 out of 50

1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH1233 reviews

305361 review

ELEMENTARYALG1 review

MATH1101 review

MATH2001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Najla Abrao

Strong pick for lower-level math if you attend and do the work, but approach higher sections carefully given the failing-class report.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Beginner

Recommended

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Patient Teaching

⚠️ Class Fail Risk

📝 Resource Support

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

🧰 About Resources

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported