AI Rate Professor

English

Gwendelyn Fuller

ENG100 · ENGLI1A · ENGL100 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Skip if and a fair shot at an A; recent students warn hard against taking her.

Best fit · Self Taught ProImpossible AMood-Based GradingLittle FeedbackInappropriate TonePolarizing
  • as impossible to earn an A and often stuck at B
  • Multiple students call lectures unhelpful, rude, or inappropriate
  • Older reviews are warmer, so the overall picture is split but leans negative

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

Students say and an A is basically off the table.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings run high with heavy essay writing and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and stress showing up for essay info.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

and many comments say .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students report mood-based marks and a ceiling of B even on clean essays.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Roughly four essays and required reading, not overwhelming volume but high grade stress.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Recent voices call her unprepared, rude, or inappropriate, outweighing older positive notes.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Course centers on essays and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ENGL sections draw sharp criticism for , and uncomfortable classroom tone, with a few older fans of her humor and energy.

Main concern

Grades feel mood-driven and many report it is nearly impossible to get an A.

What students said

“Be warned, it is impossible to get an A in this class.”
ENGL100
“She gives almost no feed back for papers and gives out a steady stream of B's for every paper.”
ENG100
“ grades were based more on her personal mood then what was actually written.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on papers rather than formal exams, so .

Essay HeavyLittle Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment is paper-driven; students complain about feedback and .

Essay HeavyLimited Feedback
“I got zero feed bad on most of my papers”
ENGL100
“gives out a steady stream of B's for every paper”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Be warned, it is impossible to get an A in this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 in-person reviews, highlighting grading frustration and split teaching views. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

22/100

“ ”

📉 Impossible A

15/100

“You can write an and has no mistakes but you will still get a B.”

😤 Teaching Quality

30/100

“You will learn nothing in her class.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it is impossible to get an A in this class
  • gives out a steady stream of B's for every paper
  • grades were based more on her personal mood

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Extremely inappropriate with students it made me really uncomfortable
  • spends the whole time merely expressing herself

Theme 3

❤️ Older Positive Notes

  • She's very thorough and very funny
  • Excellent teacher, full of variety in chosen readings
  • her classe were sooo interesting and funny

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews span 2011-2016 with mixed but detailed comments; older praise conflicts with harsh 2016 reviews.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENGL1006 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGLI1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values