AI Rate Professor

Art History

Ilana Crispi

HIST120 · ART204 · ART105 · ART120 · ART102 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already love art history or can handle heavy studio work with little hand-holding.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear AssignmentsTough Detail GraderHeavy Studio WorkloadMixed Art HistoryField Trips
  • Studio drawing classes often feel unsupported with and .
  • Art history can be clearer with lectures, study guides, and some open-book exams.
  • Workload and supply cost are high, so this is not an easy GE filler for most students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

and several students report struggling despite effort, especially in drawing.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Entry-level labels are misleading because , and independent analysis.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

as mandatory and lectures or participation clearly matter.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

38/100

Some art history students like her clarity and trips, but many studio students strongly advise against her.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and focused on tiny details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Frequent weekend assignments, papers, museum reports, and supply costs create a heavy load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Helpfulness and , though some art history lectures are clearer.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and exams rather than one single format.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

art history can be organized with trips and study guides, while , and harshly graded.

Main concern

Little help on .

What students said

“ and then grades tough”
ART204
“This is NOT an easy drawing class”
ART204
“most of the ”
ART105

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and open-book online tests, but written responses still demand heavy detail.

Study guidesSome timed online open-book examsDetail-heavy written responses

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Art history reviews mention study guides and some timed online open-book exams, while response questions stay detail-heavy.

Study guidesSome timed online open-book examsDetail-heavy written responses
“most of the ”
ART105
“she puts study guides and ”
ART105
“ but add in 'response' questions which she dosent tell you about”
80028

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You have to beg for her to teach. and then grades tough.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, highlighting studio struggle versus mixed art history experiences. Credibility rating: High.

🖌️

38/100

“ and then grades tough”

📦 Heavy Workload

25/100

“You get 2-3 assignments every weekend (about 2 hours each assignment)”

📚 Art History Bright Spot

55/100

“most of the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and unhelpful!!!!
  • She lectures incoherently, talking and jumping between subjects a mile a minute
  • and there are about 3-4 field trips

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is NOT an easy drawing class
  • grades critically on small things

Theme 3

📝

  • she puts study guides and
  • most of the
  • THE BOOK HELPS!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen in-person reviews across drawing and art history show recurring clarity and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART1056 reviews
ART2043 reviews
ART1022 reviews
ART1202 reviews
800281 review
Show 1 more courses
HIST1201 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1