AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Li Wang

MATH200 · STATS200 · MATH122 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid if ; if you can teach yourself from the book and homework.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to understandBig curveHomework-based testsRambles off topicStrict grader
  • , and full of mistakes.
  • Tests often come straight from homework and a .
  • , and tutoring center time.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A curve and , but many still call him a and say you must study hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is manageable if you do the book work, yet several rate difficulty high because lectures do not land.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

70/100

, while others advise going to lectures to stay on track.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Repeated worst-teacher warnings and clarity complaints outweigh the .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

38/100

Students call him a harsh or .

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Optional homework, book problems, and softens grades.

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Common themes are incomprehensible lectures, mistakes at the board, and wasted class time.

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

from homework.

Format shift

In-person comments only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections are polarizing: funny and helpful outside class, but and poorly structured in lecture.

Main concern

Lecture clarity is the , so students burn time decoding what he wants.

What students said

“Hands down, the . .”
MATH200
“He can be hard to understand and ramble off topic. ,BUT he gives a .”
MATH200
“ALL test questions (always 5 questions only, even on the !) are based on the .”
STATS200

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are conventional in-person .

Homework-based tests4-5 testsShort tests of about 5 questionsGenerous curveNo midterm in one stats section

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students repeatedly say and there are several short exams.

Tests from homeworkMultiple midterms/testsFinal with few questionsCurve at end
“ALL test questions (always 5 questions only, even on the !) are based on the .”
STATS200
“5 test w/ 5 questions each: half the questions will be directly from the optional hw.”
MATH200

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Hands down, the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, highlighting lecture clarity issues and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Weak Recommendation

28/100

“Hands down, the . .”

🗣️ Lecture Clarity Problems

32/100

“he is as incomprehensible as a teacher can get.”

📉

38/100

“He IS a , however you should be fine as long as you do the ”

📝

55/100

“ALL test questions (always 5 questions only, even on the !) are based on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His teaching method is terrible
  • Rambles alot and goes way off subject
  • Makes stupid jokes that only he gets

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is an easiest class and
  • ,BUT he gives a
  • you need to study ur butt off and spend hours in TLC

Theme 3

😂 About Personality

  • He loves to laugh and he will laugh for 5 min at a time
  • Very funny
  • he's a cool guy, not as bad as people say

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen mostly consistent reviews from 2006-2016 give a and .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH20012 reviews
STATS2002 reviews
MATH1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values