AI Rate Professor

English

Cleavon Smith

ENG110 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Promising for writers and , but one review means low certainty.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat feedbackLots of reading and papersTough at firstSupportive evening classHelps writers improve
  • Single review paints him as .
  • Workload includes lots of reading and papers but is framed as growth-oriented.
  • Evening students note practical care such as bringing dinner.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Reading and papers sound substantial, but strong feedback suggests grades reward real improvement rather than .

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Described as and papers, not as an intro blow-off course.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

All .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

The only review calls him awesome, fun, and a great guy who improves writing.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

; feedback-focused comments imply fair standards for writing growth.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Lots of reading and papers make the load real, though framed as worthwhile.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Praised as awesome with , and practical student care.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Review emphasizes papers and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One in-person ENG110 review: initially tough, heavy reading and .

Main concern

Early toughness and .

What students said

“Lots of reading and however so you can become a better writer.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Only papers and ; .

PapersWriting feedback

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Papers and ; no explicit exam proctoring details are given.

PapersWriting feedback
“Lots of reading and however so you can become a better writer.”
ENG110

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mr Smith is awesome. In the beginning of the semester he seems tough so many students dropped his class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting feedback and support. Credibility rating: Low.

✍️

82/100

“ so you can become a better writer.”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“for the evening class he provided great dinners many times because he knows we are all rushing work.”

📚 Workload Reality

45/100

“Lots of reading and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Mr Smith is awesome.
  • His class is fun
  • Great guy!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • In the beginning of the semester he seems tough so many students dropped his class.
  • Lots of reading and however

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Only one review from 2015 limits confidence despite detailed and positive content.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values