AI Rate Professor

English

Megan Riedel

ENG846 · ENG106 · ENG110 · ENGL836 · ENGL846 · ENG100 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if , and chase ; skip if you need fast replies and teacher-led lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEssay-heavy workloadMixed teaching qualitySlow email repliesStudent-led discussionsExtra credit available
  • Strong praise for clarity and help when students engage, mixed with sharp criticism of limited office access and slow emails.
  • Heavy essay load and ; class average often described as a C.
  • and full participation can raise grades, but and student-led lectures frustrate some.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible with all essays and , but many report a proud C average and .

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is standard community-college English with lots of essays and analysis, not unusually abstract.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and essay prep; several call it mandatory.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Some call her great and ; and weak support.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Students note a C average she seems proud of; hard grader unless and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple essays, projects, peer reviews, and nonstop essay cycles especially in 5-unit sections.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

and help for engaged students, but others report student-led lectures, snobby tone, and no email help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and projects more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English sections mix clear, involved teaching with , and .

Main concern

Slow or , and classes that run late or feel student-led.

What students said

“She's very thorough and .”
ENG100
“She is nice enough but not my first choice. She is a a C”
ENG846
“Don't let her smile deceive you. , but she does not take the .”
ENG846

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays and in-class activities rather than formal proctored exams.

Essay-based assessmentPeer reviewClass activity grades

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Assessment centers on essays, peer reviews, and class activities; .

Essay-based assessmentPeer reviewClass activities
“ because you are graded on class activities, and peer reviews.”
ENG846
“Be ready to go from one essay to the next cus it don't stop! AND !”
ENGL846

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Honestly don't know why her rating is so low. Class had a lot of work involved, but what do you expect from a 5 unit english class? She teaches VERY well”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2013, highlighting teaching, grading, and communication themes. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Teaching Clarity

58/100

“She's very thorough and . Group discussions were great and she is very involved with the class.”

⚖️

35/100

“She is a a C and she seems proud of that!”

📧 Support Gap

40/100

“She doesn't answer your emails, even though ... Riedel is just a teacher you DON'T want to have ever.”

📝 Workload Reality

30/100

“Class had a lot of work involved, but what do you expect from a 5 unit english class?”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will sit down and talk to you like a person
  • She teaches VERY well; I learned plenty of things
  • Her class lectures are led by her students rather than her

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • she offers
  • She told the class her avg is a C, but I got an A
  • the average grade in her class is a C

Theme 3

📬 About Communication

  • she does not take the
  • She doesn't answer your emails
  • it was hard to reach her outside of class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews from 2009-2013 with mixed but specific praise and complaints; older sample lowers recency.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 55
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG8466 reviews
ENGL8462 reviews
ENG1001 review
ENG1061 review
ENG1101 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGL8361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values