AI Rate Professor

Law

Althea Kippes

LEGL252 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want real pleadings work and courtroom context.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPractice-Focused LawCourt Field TripsPassionate And CaringReal Pleadings PracticeKnows Her Field
  • Strong practical legal instruction with pleadings examples and court visits
  • Only two older reviews, so breadth of evidence is limited

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Difficulty is moderate; success seems to come from engaged practice work rather than .

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Reported difficulty is low-moderate with practical, applied legal skills rather than abstract theory.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

Both reviews are clearly positive on practice value, care, and subject expertise.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

No harsh-grader complaints; quality.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Pleadings assignments, practice-guide work, and a court field trip imply solid but manageable effort.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students highlight clear practice examples, field knowledge, passion, and a useful court field trip.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Comments emphasize pleadings and .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Practical LEGL instructor who uses real pleadings examples, practice guides, and court field trips, with a .

Main concern

Required California practice guides add cost; sample size is only two reviews.

What students said

“Gave great examples of pleadings and related assignments.”
LEGL252
“Passionate and caring. Knows her field.”
LEGL252

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; assessment appears assignment and practice oriented.

Practice PleadingsCourt Field Trip

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person LEGL work centers on pleadings practice and a court field trip; .

Practice PleadingsCourt Field Trip
“Gave great examples of pleadings and related assignments.”
LEGL252
“Field trip to federal and state court helped bring the material together.”
LEGL252

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Gave great examples of pleadings and related assignments. Required students to buy California practice guides to follow rules of litigation. Even when a little rushed, she gave good practice in anticipating the needs of a lawyer.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews (2011-2013) focused on practical legal training. Credibility rating: Low.

⚖️ Practical Training

86/100

“Gave great examples of pleadings and related assignments.”

❤️ Caring Expert

84/100

“Passionate and caring. Knows her field.”

🏛️ Court Connection

80/100

“Field trip to federal and state court helped bring the material together.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Passionate and caring. Knows her field.
  • Even when a little rushed, she gave good practice in anticipating the needs of a lawyer.

Theme 2

📚 About Course Work

  • Gave great examples of pleadings and related assignments
  • Required students to buy California practice guides
  • Field trip to federal and state court helped bring the material together.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only two positive in-person reviews from 2011-2013 with and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LEGL2522 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values