AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Cody Bahir

PHIL320 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a fun, lively philosophy class with a nice professor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging lecturesSuper niceMakes topics come aliveFun philosophy class
  • Students , and fun.
  • He makes philosophy topics come alive rather than dry book knowledge.
  • Only two old reviews, both positive with moderate difficulty.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

No grades given; moderate difficulty ratings suggest a fair effort A, not a free pass.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty rated around 3 with comments that students learned a lot, not that content was trivial.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Both reviews praise him as great and awesome with no negatives.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

No grade outcomes reported; tone .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

; moderate difficulty implies a normal workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

85/100

Students , and brings topics to life.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person PHIL320 felt great: students learned a lot and found him fun and engaging.

Main concern

Very few and very old reviews limit confidence.

What students said

“Great class! Learned a lot.”
PHIL320
“Awesome professor!!!!! come alive and not just boring book knowledge.”
PHIL320

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome professor!!!!! come alive and not just boring book knowledge.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews from 2011. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

85/100

“makes the topics come alive and not just boring book knowledge”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“Great class! Learned a lot.”

😊 Professor Personality

90/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • makes the topics come alive and not just boring book knowledge
  • Great class! Learned a lot.

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Awesome professor!!!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two brief reviews from 2011 with no grades, tags, or .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL3202 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values