AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

T.J. Aleem

MATH110 · MATH222 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

; only consider lower algebra if and work in groups.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBarely TeachesHard Uncovered TestsPolarizing by CourseGroup QuizzesDrops Lowest Score
  • MATH222 students overwhelmingly say he rushes, barely teaches, and .
  • MATH110 summer students praise , and .
  • Overall experience is highly course-dependent and often described as a teaching disaster in precalculus.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A is hard because tests and and as harsh in precalc.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Average difficulty is very high and students say pace is rushed with abstract material left for self-study.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students, especially in MATH222, and call him the .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Precalc students say he grades hard; algebra students note dropped lowest quiz and test but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Online homework, in-class book work, hard quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive algebra notes on explanations are outweighed by repeated claims he barely teaches and rushes chapters.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and tests, with some group work and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

algebra students liked group work and , while precalculus students called him the worst and .

Main concern

Tests and quizzes often cover problems never taught in class, especially in MATH222.

What students said

“ ! His most used line in class was you guys are giving me more work he rushes through all the chps.”
MATH222
“He lets you work in groups on everything except tests and .”
MATH110
“ and his test problems are from the book; once again, problems we never went over.”
MATH222

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are widely described as harder than class coverage and not student-friendly.

Hard TestsBook Problems Not CoveredHard QuizzesDrop Lowest Test

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and lecture and feel beyond class material.

Hard TestsBook Problems Not CoveredHard QuizzesDrop Lowest Test
“ in class.”
MATH222
“ . and don't go over the materials well.”
MATH222

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher is single handedly the college career. !”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews, highlighting the sharp MATH110 vs MATH222 split. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚨 Teaching Quality

35/100

“He barely teaches and usually sits. I would have been much better off taking someone else.”

📉 Recommendation

30/100

“ !”

📝

28/100

“ in class.”

👍 Algebra Side

70/100

“I would take any math class taught by T.J. Aleem”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He barely teaches and usually sits.
  • He rushes through all the chps. &
  • He'll spend 10mins on the chp assumes you understand him

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • but he lets you work in groups.
  • and .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Choice

  • !
  • I would take any math class taught by T.J. Aleem
  • I had this guy for pre-cal but i dropped in the middle of the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed 2011 reviews with consistent course-level split; small sample and old dates limit confidence.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH2224 reviews
MATH1102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values