AI Rate Professor

English

. Hibble

LIT101 · LIT165 · ENGL100 · ENGL165 · LIT100 · ENGL110 · ENG100 · ENG165 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you can stay on schedule and and writing; avoid if you need a low-work easy A.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear FeedbackStrict DeadlinesHeavy Writing LoadExtra Credit AvailableSelf-Discipline Required
  • Most students , and real writing improvement.
  • Workload is heavy with , and zero late work.
  • and some grade cushion exist, but slackers and weak self-starters struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

and some grade cushion help, but weekly work, strict deadlines, and no late work mean an A still requires consistent effort.

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Interesting readings and , yet lots of reading, writing, analysis, and self-pacing make it a real academic lift.

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

Several students note first-day only or fully remote-style work after kickoff, so ongoing seat time is not the main pressure.

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

and writing growth, with a smaller avoid camp focused on heavy workload.

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Strict on deadlines and grammar, but and comments like missing 100 points and still earning an A soften the blow.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Weekly assignments, essays, forums, novels, and group work pile up; multiple students say it is more work than face-to-face.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and many students report major writing improvement.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and reading responses rather than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 19 in-person-tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and literature courses with strict deadlines, heavy reading and writing, and strong payoff for disciplined effort.

Main concern

No late work, heavy weekly load, and high self-discipline demand; a minority call the .

What students said

“She provides !”
LIT101
“She is strict on late work and you've got to put in a lot of work in her class. She encourages her students to get a higher grade by allowing .”
ENG165
“Can miss 100 points and still get an A. Professor is very helpful and .”
ENGL165

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is assignment and essay driven; reviews do not describe strict proctored exams.

Assignment HeavyEssay FocusedNo Clear Proctoring Mention

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and weekly writing with no clear webcam or Lockdown Browser policy.

Assignment HeavyEssay FocusedStrict Deadlines
“2 essays, advertising campaign, letter to a company and forum entries. Deadlines are critical.”
ENGL165
“Lots of . Be prepare to read a novel, work with a .”
LIT165

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've taken many of Miss. Hibble's class because they are all online and she is awesome! She is strict on late work and you've got to put in a lot of work in her class. She encourages her students to get a higher grade by allowing . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting teaching clarity, deadline rigor, and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is so smart and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ ! Many enjoy writing taking her class.”

📚 Heavy But Fair Workload

28/100

“This online class requires more work than in a face to face class.”

🎁 Buffer

64/100

“She encourages her students to get a higher grade by allowing .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She provides
  • thinking

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • strict on late work and you've got to put in a lot of work
  • Can miss 100 points and still get an A
  • Do all your work with effort and you should manage pretty well

Theme 3

⚠️ About Self-Discipline

  • slackers won't make it
  • you have to be very discipline on your work. No late work accepted
  • if you plan on slacking because you won't make it through

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews spanning 2007-2011 with consistent themes on feedback, deadlines, and workload; a and fake-review suspicions reduce perfect confidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1657 reviews
LIT1653 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGL1652 reviews
LIT1012 reviews
Show 3 more courses
ENGL1001 review
ENGL1101 review
LIT1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values