AI Rate Professor

Economics

Ravej Singh

ECON101 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

review calling the teaching awful and unhelpful.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerUnclear LecturesNo ActivitiesMarathon LecturingNot RecommendedHard Course Feel
  • Student found lectures unclear and unhelpful for three full hours.
  • No group work or partner activities to break up passive lecturing.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Difficulty rated 5 and lectures were unhelpful, so earning a strong grade would likely require heavy outside effort.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Student rated difficulty 5 and said lectures failed to clarify content.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Student explicitly would not recommend after finding lectures awful and unhelpful.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

25/100

No grade data given, but high difficulty plus unhelpful lectures imply a tough path to strong marks.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Main complaint is marathon lecturing rather than piles of homework; outside study likely needed to compensate.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Lectures described as , and not recommended.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Review does .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Three-hour passive lectures described as unclear and unhelpful with no interactive activities.

Main concern

Lectures do not help learning and the .

What students said

“This teacher was awful. . Lectures the entire 3 hours, with no group or partner activity.”
ECON101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was awful. . Lectures the entire 3 hours, with no group or partner activity. Would not recommend taking this teacher”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review, highlighting unclear lecturing and . Credibility rating: Low.

💥 Teaching Disaster

15/100

“This teacher was awful. .”

⏱️ Passive Marathon Lectures

18/100

“Lectures the entire 3 hours, with no group or partner activity.”

🚫

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures the entire 3 hours, with no group or partner activity

Theme 2

👎 About Overall Experience

  • This teacher was awful

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

Single 2011 review with strong negative tone but .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ECON1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values