AI Rate Professor

Design

Tammy Calderon

CLASS · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless and tolerate disorganization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedConfusing gradingSyllabus changesLate-night emailsPowerPoint only
  • Liked as a person but not as an instructor.
  • , and last-minute supply demands frustrate students.
  • Only one mid-quality review, but the critique is specific and severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Difficulty 4 plus confusing grading make a clean A effortful and uncertain.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Student rated difficulty 4 and described chaotic expectations rather than simple content.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Quality 2 and explicit preference against her as an .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

as making no sense, raising unfairness risk.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Last-minute supply lists and constant syllabus changes create stressful extra work.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and not knowledgeably instructional.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as a person but unorganized as a teacher, with and frequent syllabus changes.

Main concern

, and over-reliance on PowerPoints.

What students said

“I like Ms Calderon as a person, as an instructor not so much. .”
CLASS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; and syllabus churn.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I like Ms Calderon as a person, as an instructor not so much. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review; credibility Low due to single-sample evidence.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“as an instructor not so much. .”

📋 Organization Issues

22/100

“she changes the syllabus WAY too much”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“students need a teacher that is knowledgeable, not one that ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • as an instructor not so much

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • expects you to have them the next day
  • changes the syllabus WAY too much

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

One detailed 2014 review with high thumbs-up agreement, but still a single-sample risk.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CLASS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values