AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Sarah Ghannadan

MATH40 · MATH65 · MATH1 · MATH2 · MATH30 · MATH55 · MATH47 · MATH140 · MATH107 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
30.91%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can follow rigid formatting rules and handle Proctorio plus a heavy weekly load.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough formatter graderHeavy busyworkProctorio examsPolarized reviewsLong instructions
  • ; many hate formatting rules and tone
  • Workload is heavy with multi-page instructions, papers, and constant assignments
  • and zero tolerance for process mistakes

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

As are possible if you follow every format rule and , but and many still struggle.

Online reviews stress format zeros and Proctorio; and harsh scoring.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content can be standard, but long videos, busywork, and strict presentation rules make the experience harder than the math alone.

Both formats report heavy process overhead beyond core math difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Some online sections while many in-person and as mandatory.

In-person more often mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Take-again support is low overall; positives exist but .

Online and common in each.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly lose points for commas, notation, red-pen logistics, and process steps rather than pure math.

Format shift

Online formatting rules and as strict.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

, and multi-page instructions dominate student time.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy load; summer and accelerated sections feel extreme.

Teaching experience

Average

38/100

Lecture clarity is praised by some and called error-filled or unhelpful by others, with interpersonal tone a major split.

Format shift

Online positives focus on video clarity; in-person negatives focus on rudeness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Exams and and labs that feed into test readiness.

Format shift

Online adds Proctorio logistics; in-person emphasizes no-notes testing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person students often report rudeness, mandatory attendance, tough tests, and .

Main concern

Harsh interpersonal tone and .

What students said

“ if she is you only option.”
MATH1
“Prepare to be constantly bombarded with coursework, tests and ”
MATH40
“Professor G is one of the even kidding.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , but Proctorio, formatting nitpicks, and massive instructions for many others.

Main concern

Proctorio room scans, multi-step exam rules, and .

What students said

“formatting and how you write your equations matter more than actually getting the math correct.”
MATH1
“This felt like I was taking a writing class rather than a math course.”
MATH40
“As long as you watch the and should be passing with an A.”
MATH40

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

harsh deductions for process or format mistakes.

ProctorioRoom scanNo notesFormat-sensitive scoringLong exam instructions

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person and hybrid-era reviews describe hard no-notes tests, harsh scoring, and .

No notesTough graderTest heavyHarsh deductions
“tests and so you must memorize everything she ever gives you.”
MATH40
“ ”
MATH2

Online

, and zero tolerance if a room-scan or instruction step fails.

ProctorioRoom scan30-step exam rulesNo notes
“The tests have 12 steps to take them and most are severe privacy invasions.”
MATH65
“for tests there are 30 steps to . If you mess up on one tiny thing your test will get a 0.”
MATH1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“formatting and how you write your equations matter more than actually getting the math correct.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“I felt like I was actually learning from her lecture videos, she gave a lot of resources and .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“Whatever you do dont have her as a teacher”

📚 Workload Pain

20/100

“About 12 assignments a week, a brutal workload.”

🔒

18/100

“She makes you scan your entire room while taking the test and gives you a zero if you mess up the room scan.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes step by step in her lecture videos
  • so you'll be doing a lot of learning on your own

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you miss the comma
  • Cant get easy A for sure.

Theme 3

📝

  • Uses proctorio (which is a pain)
  • The instructions for the .
  • This felt like I was taking a writing class rather than a math course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with large online and , and and workload details.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 518
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 534

Course coverage

MATH3017 reviews
MATH4011 reviews
MATH18 reviews
MATH24 reviews
MATH553 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH653 reviews
MATH472 reviews
MATH1071 review
MATH1401 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 8

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

22

Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 5