AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

GHOLAMREZA BROJERDI

MATH1 · MATH3 · MATH5 · MATH30 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you already know the math and can teach yourself from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplainerInconsistent GradingSelf-Study RequiredExam HeavyAvoid If Possible
  • Students almost never recommend him despite sometimes passable grades.
  • , and slide-reading with weak answers to questions.
  • Success usually comes from prior math background or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students earn As through prior knowledge, end-of-term homework, or , but and exam-heavy.

Online allows more retries and auto-grading; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Course content feels hard mainly because and .

Both formats require self-teaching; Calc 2 in person is described as especially brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Most reviews mark attendance mandatory, with as well.

Online and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

; students repeatedly say stay away even when they pass.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students report same answers graded 100 or 0, tough exam weight, and little help fixing confusion.

Format shift

In-person shows inconsistent scoring; online is more auto-graded but .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

and test-heavy courses require constant catch-up, though some deadlines pile at semester end.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of homework; online sometimes allows late completion before the end.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Comments repeatedly say he cannot explain, answers I do not know, makes lecture and test mistakes, and reads slides.

Format shift

Online and him knowing content.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Exams and while homework and .

Format shift

Online math1 and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person MATH3/MATH5/MATH30 reviews describe a mistakes on tests, uneven scoring, and .

Main concern

, and grades inconsistently.

What students said

“Brojerdi is such a nice person, but such a terrible professor.”
MATH3
“By the end of the class, only 5 people were left. .”
MATH30
“i would pray id get in an accident on the way to class”
MATH3

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online math1/MATH30 is passable if you already know calculus, with auto-graded work and , but lectures still make little sense.

Main concern

Confusing lectures and .

What students said

“his lectures make no sense. i only got an A because i took calc in high school”
math1
“You live if you already have a Calculus background from high school. If not, I hope god helps you.”
math1
“Hard to not pass. He gave us the chance to have multiple tries on the homeworks, quizzes, AND tests.”
MATH30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams dominate grades; online sometimes allows multiple tries, while and .

Exam heavySometimes multiple tries onlineHomework harder than examsInconsistent scoring

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but suffer from mistakes, uneven scoring, and poor alignment with teaching.

Exams similar to class examplesInconsistent point awardsTest errors
“the and are similar to problems in class.”
MATH3
“He literally gave half the class 100% on one problem and the other half 0% on the same problem, even though they got the same answer!”
MATH3

Online

Online students note auto-grading and, at least , and tests.

Multiple exam triesAuto-graded workExam heavy
“He gave us the chance to have multiple tries on the homeworks, quizzes, AND tests.”
MATH30
“Exams, and .”
math1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Brojerdi is such a nice person, but such a terrible professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews across online and in-person math courses, highlighting weak teaching and ; credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Collapse

8/100

“Do yourself a .”

📉 Teaching Quality

16/100

“ but awful at teaching.”

🧠

70/100

“i only got an A because i took calc in high school and was familiar with the subject.”

⚖️

28/100

“He literally gave half the class 100% on one problem and the other half 0% on the same problem, even though they got the same answer!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • reads off the slides and doesn't seem to understand student's questions.
  • he knows the concepts very well but .
  • Constantly makes mistakes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Hard to not pass.
  • By the end of the class, only 5 people were left. .
  • The homework and the example problems he does in class are harder than the actual exams.

Theme 3

💔 About Student Experience

  • i would pray id get in an accident on the way to class
  • Stay away from this professor.
  • He was also late to most classes.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews are consistent and detailed, but the sample is modest and split across several courses and formats.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 57

Course coverage

math13 reviews
MATH33 reviews
MATH303 reviews
MATH51 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 5 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2