AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Stephanie Tyler

MATH65A · MATH65 · MATH45 · MATH30 · MATH55A · MATH20 · ALGEB55 · MATH33 · MATH55 · CALC1 · CALCULUS1 · MATH38 · MATH39 · MATH100 · MATH107 · 59 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
27.59%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless you want a high-effort math bootcamp and can handle rigid daily work and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderOverwhelming homeworkRigid deadlinesMicromanaged notesTest heavy
  • Workload is heavy with , and strict formatting that .
  • and and formatted assignments.
  • A minority say she prepares students well for higher math if you put in full effort and use office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong students report tough grading, heavy daily work, and A.

Online reviews stress rigid daily workload; and fast lectures.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Math content plus volume of assignments and fast pacing make the course feel hard beyond standard expectations.

Both formats call it hard; online adds note and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

; online still demands daily check-ins and fixed deadlines.

Online is often async-labeled but still has daily due work; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

and many run-away comments outweigh a smaller group who praise preparation and help for committed students.

Recent online MATH39 reviews are especially negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Repeated tough-grader tags, points lost for format, and .

Format shift

Online students emphasize format deductions; .

Workload

Overwhelming

15/100

, and long packets create a near full-time load.

Format shift

Online workload is described as worse with daily submissions and printing; .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some call her helpful and caring, but many say lectures are unclear, outdated, or assume prior knowledge.

Format shift

Online students often rely on external videos; in-person students often rely on the book and tutors.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

and notes plus major test weight and occasional papers or labs.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections are fast-paced and ; some find her helpful if you ask questions, many say lectures are weak and .

Main concern

, and lectures that leave students learning from the book or YouTube.

What students said

“Prepare to do LOTS of work, write 2x notes, and even a few papers.”
MATH39
“She lectures horribly and uses like two examples in class and on the .”
MATH30
“ . Trust me”
MATH33

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online MATH39 is described as material-heavy and not truly async-friendly, with daily , and harsh formatting rules.

Main concern

Daily deadlines, printing/notes micromanagement, and no flexibility make the online format extremely stressful.

What students said

“This is NOT Asynchronous friendly. Plan to have no other classes or work.”
MATH39
“assigns a lot of and reflections for each unit”
MATH39
“The amount of work she assigns takes away from your ability to learn.”
MATH39

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are high-stakes and graded strictly; some report proctoring or scheduling problems and .

Test heavyTough grader on examsTest-taking software issues reportedLimited practice exams

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard and picky with limited practice exams and material that sometimes feels disconnected from lectures.

Hard testsPicky gradingFew practice exams
“She doesn't even give you have a .”
MATH30
“ ”
MATH33

Online

Online exams and rules; at least one report of test software mishandling.

Hard online testsStrict gradingTest software problems reported
“when it comes to exams/tests/labs, she looks at everything under a microscope”
MATH39
“She also couldn't administer the because of incompetency.”
MATH39

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . The professor is an and assigns overwhelming daily work, even though it's asynchronous.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (13 online, 37 in-person), highlighting workload, grading harshness, and split teaching views. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Overload

15/100

“You need a printer. You will print ALOT... Something due everyday or other. This is NOT Asynchronous friendly.”

⚖️

22/100

“her criteria for ... if you don't follow her format.”

👎 Low Recommendation

28/100

“I wish I never enrolled with Prof. Tyler. Pick someone else if you can!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and require external videos to understand
  • She assumes you know everything and wants you to just read the book
  • but when you ask her questions she is very helpful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but . LOTS of HW so start early
  • This is a tough class and if you are looking for an easy A math credit
  • Almost no one could finish her tests, the amount of

Theme 3

😤 About Workload Stress

  • The most material-heavy async course I've ever taken
  • There's bh hw, web assign, labs, presentations, interviews, enrichments, & notes
  • If you dont have a job every other

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

59

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across many years and both formats show a durable pattern of heavy workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 514
4 out of 59
3 out of 56
2 out of 59
1 out of 521

Course coverage

MATH3917 reviews
MATH556 reviews
MATH1005 reviews
MATH305 reviews
MATH653 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH202 reviews
MATH332 reviews
MATH382 reviews
1071 review
ALGEB551 review
CALC11 review
CALCULUS11 review
MATH1071 review
MATH451 review
MATH55A1 review
MATH65A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

3

C 1 · C- 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

12

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 8