AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nooshin Jamasbi

MATH121 · MATH65 · MATH34 · MATH55093 · MATH20 · MATH30 · MATH55 · MATH107 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her if you will do the and use tutoring; skip if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringLots of HomeworkTest CorrectionsLecture HeavyPlatform Dependent
  • Many students say she wants you to pass and , and .
  • Lectures are often long, brief on examples, or PowerPoint-heavy, so .
  • and quizzes/tests can be unforgiving if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

An A is reachable if because quizzes mirror HW and she often allows corrections or .

and easy A path via HW; online still allows passing algebra but with more friction.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Material is standard lower-division math difficulty, made harder by thin lectures and .

; online and higher courses feel harder due to weak teaching.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

while others treat it as required and say skipping hurts your grade.

In-person reviews split between optional and mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

because she is caring, while others warn you mostly teach yourself.

In-person recommendation is mixed-positive; online reviews lean strongly against taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

68/100

Clear criteria, homework-aligned quizzes, extensions, and .

Format shift

Leniency is clearer in person; online comments still call her tough on some items.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Lots of , and daily platform check-ins add up.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy platform work; online adds surprise quiz deadlines.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Students split between kind helpful instruction and brief lectures that force self-teaching.

Format shift

and help; online teaching quality is rated much lower.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Frequent homework and quizzes matter, but .

Format shift

but ; online relies on textbook-site quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring and grade-help oriented for many, but lectures can be thin and platform-heavy.

Main concern

Boring or minimal .

What students said

“ and offers students extensions for .”
MATH121
“She really wants , and overall is very understanding”
22456
“Teaches one problem in a subject, and declares that you know the subject.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, , and little real teaching.

Main concern

, and daily logins required.

What students said

“Be safe and . She just copies and pastes the textbook and puts it in a powerpoint.”
MATH55
“you'll just log on to see that you missed like 3 quizzes, and basically need to log on every single day.”
MATH30
“do NOT take her for anything that is calc 1 or above.”
MATH30

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes often mirror homework while after weak scores.

Homework-Like QuizzesTest CorrectionsNotes on Quizzes SometimesNo Notes on Tests

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; quizzes may allow notes while tests usually do not.

Study Guide Matches TestsTest CorrectionsNotes on Quizzes
“ but .”
MATH30
“ !”
MATH34
“The tests and .”
MATH121

Online

Online reviews mention textbook-site quizzes posted without notification; .

Textbook Site QuizzesNo Notification Quizzes
“ , but you won't get any notification about them”
MATH30
“She gives like 2 examples for an entire section most of the time and then expects you to know how to do all different types of problems.”
MATH55

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She really wants , and overall is very understanding if require an .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, balancing support praise with lecture and platform complaints. Credibility rating: High.

❤️ Student Support

70/100

“She genuinely wants you to succeed and will do everything to get you the highest grade if you just ask.”

📚 Self-Teaching Load

40/100

“She does not teach the concepts that are on the quizzes and own.”

🎯

62/100

“If you spend time on the all for the quizzes”

👎 Online Experience

30/100

“Be safe and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are very long and boring though.
  • Most the lectures are from powerpoints
  • She just puts up the

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Overall I didn't learn much but it's not hard to get an A
  • .
  • The .

Theme 3

💻 About Platforms & Cost

  • everything is done on Pearson.
  • The hw software costs $110 out of your own pocket.
  • Uses cengage for all assignments but labs.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen reviews over many years show a and weak lecture quality.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH306 reviews
MATH553 reviews
224562 reviews
MATH1212 reviews
MATH652 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1071 review
MATH201 review
MATH341 review
MATH550931 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 6

B range

3

B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1