AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Megha Agarwal

MATH1 · MATH30 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Only take her if and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyUnclear LecturesFast PaceHomework Plus Exams
  • Grades rest on few high-stakes tests with no calculator or cheat sheet.
  • Lecture clarity and .
  • An A is possible with heavy study and office hours, not guaranteed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A needs , and many students land low scores.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students describe confusion, fast pacing, and high difficulty on math content.

All five reviews are in person for MATH1 or MATH30.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

and others not, with no consistent optional policy.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

A if they work hard; and frustrated.

All evidence is in person; and sparse.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

, and no calculator or cheat sheet.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

; not endless busywork but high study load.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some call her nice and ; others say explanations are unclear or rushed.

Format shift

In-person only; quality ranges from 1 to 5.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Multiple reviews , and test-heavy tags.

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH1 and MATH30 students split on niceness versus confusion, with and lecture-heavy pacing.

Main concern

make recovery hard after a bad test.

What students said

“I have never in .”
MATH1
“The teacher often did not explain the material clearly or before moving on.”
MATH30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and strict rules make exams high risk.

No CalculatorNo Cheat SheetThree Tests Plus FinalTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a final with no calculator or cheat sheet reported.

No CalculatorNo Cheat SheetThree Tests Plus Final
“3 tests including final. Wasn't a very hard class and an A is achievable. However, a lot of people got low scores on the tests. No calculator or cheat sheet.”
MATH1
“There are 3 exams, then the final.”
MATH30

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never in .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting test pressure and mixed clarity. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“The way she explained things was hard to understand at times, but if so.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

42/100

“Overall a nice person, but you have to put in the work to do well in this class.”

⚖️

28/100

“a lot of people got low scores on the tests. No calculator or cheat sheet.”

📚

28/100

“There are 3 exams, then the final.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I have never in .
  • Many lessons felt rushed.
  • She explained things well and cleared up any confusion we had.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • an A is achievable. However, a lot of people got low scores on the tests.
  • you have to put in the work to do well in this class.

Theme 3

🧪 About Assessment

  • The class and three tests.
  • No calculator or cheat sheet.
  • Has packets with every lecture.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

and quality, enough for a cautious signal but limited breadth.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH13 reviews
MATH302 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values