AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jason Morris

MATH3 · MATH5 · MATH1 · MATH34 · MATH2 · MATH55A · CALC2MATH38 · CALC2 · CALCU1 · CALCULUS2 · MTH20081 · CALC1AND3 · MATH38 · MATH10 · MATH7 · 102 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
30.3%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want rigorous math training and and a tough demeanor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrutal examsTest-heavy gradingPolarizing lecturerHeavy selective homeworkHardcore only
  • Lectures can be excellent for strong math students, but many call him rude and unforgiving.
  • About 90% of the ; and graded on few problems.
  • ; only hardcore learners who thrive under pressure should enroll.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

As are rare without mastery; and .

Online and as very hard due to 90% exam weight.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

14/100

Fast lectures, dense proofs, and .

Difficulty is high in both formats; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and warn that skipping means failing, though .

; in-person is frequently mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Only about 30% would take again; praise exists but most recent students advise alternatives.

Online reviews are strongly negative; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough , and little grade cushion beyond tests.

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

and still only a few problems .

Format shift

Both formats report very long homework; online also cites all-day assignments.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

, but many experience yelling, skipped steps, and confusion.

Format shift

In-person has more glowing lecture praise; .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

92/100

Three tests plus final often total about 90% of the course grade.

Format shift

and widely reported in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

some call him the tests and yelling.

Main concern

and harsh classroom .

What students said

“Without a doubt I would not have been as successful in my engineering career if it wasnt for him.”
MATH3
“Yells at students for asking simple questions, grades 30-50 problem long homework assignments off of 5 problems”
MATH7
“No amount of preparation ever got me ready for the tests. They were crazy difficult”
MATH3

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Proctorio, 90% exam weight, huge homework, and .

Main concern

Proctored exams and .

What students said

“Makes 3 tests and final 90% of your grade. Uses Proctorio to record you testing in online classes.”
CALC2
“The tests and final combined are worth 90 percent of your grade!”
MATH3
“ .”
MATH10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are closed-resource, high-stakes, and .

90% examsProctorio onlineNo calculators/cheatsheetsTimed brutal testsLowest test dropped sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and only loosely aligned with homework for many students.

Brutal timed testsPractice tests sometimes helpfulLowest test droppedNo easy partial credit
“No amount of preparation ever got me ready for the tests. They were crazy difficult”
MATH3
“ .”
MATH3

Online

, and late submissions become zeros.

ProctorioNo calculatorsNo cheatsheets90% exam weightLate equals zero
“Makes 3 tests and final 90% of your grade. Uses Proctorio to record you testing in online classes. .”
CALC2
“tests are 90% of the grade and he doesn't ”
MATH3

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Makes 3 tests and final 90% of your grade. Uses Proctorio to record you testing in online classes. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting exam risk, polarizing lectures, and . Credibility rating: High.

🔥

24/100

“The tests and final combined are worth 90 percent of your grade!”

🧠 Polarizing teaching

52/100

“Without a doubt I would not have been as successful in my engineering career if it wasnt for him.”

⚠️ Harsh classroom tone

18/100

“Yells at students for asking simple questions, grades 30-50 problem long homework assignments off of 5 problems”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Amazing Professor! Humble, and Helpful!
  • Lectures are very heavy and boring, but thorough
  • He is extremely passionate about the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • tests are 90% of the grade and he doesn't
  • grade

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Unnecessarily rude. His class smelled like cigarettes
  • He was very disrespectful and condescending whenever you would ask a question
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

102

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and a and frustrated avoiders.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 555
4 out of 514
3 out of 510
2 out of 511
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH313 reviews
MATH27 reviews
MATH105 reviews
MATH75 reviews
CALC24 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH14 reviews
MATH342 reviews
MATH382 reviews
MATH52 reviews
CALC1AND31 review
CALC2MATH381 review
CALCU11 review
CALCULUS21 review
MATH55A1 review
MTH200811 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

31 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 3 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

9

B+ 1 · B 7 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5 · Rather not say 1