AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Randolph Taylor

MATH39 · MATH55 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Worth considering for trigonometry if you will attend every lecture; if you need a low-effort free A or .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture heavyLenient on testsAttendance requiredPolarizingAmazing lectures
  • Recent trig students praise clear lectures and and notes.
  • and warns that skipping kills the grade.
  • and participation matters, so no-shows struggle.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Trig students report an A mainly from attending and notes with lenient tests, but another course yielded a C+ and felt hard.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits mid-range overall, with one course rated moderate and another rated hard.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

and lenient grading; the other would not.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

One review stresses he is not a and walks through wrong test answers; the other implies a tougher experience.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload centers on lecture attendance and notes .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praised for amazing lectures and , but the second review is only a one-word hard complaint with quality 1.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

62/100

Tests and lecture notes drive grades more than textbook or project work.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student got an A by showing up and , while another found the course hard and .

Main concern

and uneven difficulty across courses make outcomes inconsistent.

What students said

“all you have to do to get an A in the class is just show up and ”
MATH39
“Hard :/”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and aligned with lectures, with at least one report of lenient walkthroughs on missed problems.

In-person testsLenient feedback on wrong answersLecture-aligned

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes; one student says he shows correct methods after wrong answers and is not a .

In-person testsLenient feedback
“Even on the and shows you how to do the problems the correct way if you got them wrong”
MATH39

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher for trigonometry, all you have to do to get an A in the class is just show up and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews spanning 2018-2024, highlighting split experiences in lectures and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Great teacher for trigonometry, all you have to do to get an A in the class is just show up and .”

⚖️

55/100

“he's very leniant and shows you how to do the problems the correct way if you got them wrong and is not a ”

📅

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher for trigonometry
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • all you have to do to get an A is just show up and
  • Hard :/
  • not a

Theme 3

📅

  • Yes
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • Participation matters

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews spanning 2018 to 2024 with conflicting tones and sparse detail limit confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH391 review
MATH551 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values