AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jeffrey Darck

MATH42A · MATH40 · MATH42 · MATH4O · PROB42A · MATH33 · MATH55 · 55B · STAT42A · MATH39 · MATH107 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material well and and samples.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderConfusing lecturesTest heavyUnprofessional commentsDisorganized
  • Majority of students , and tests that feel disconnected from homework.
  • Multiple reports of unprofessional personal comments and humiliating classroom behavior.
  • A minority succeed by doing all worksheets, attending, and using office hours.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even supportive reviews say you must do all work and stay locked in; many call him a .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

, and poorly aligned with the book or homework.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warnings that skipping hurts your grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students urge others to avoid him due , and unprofessional behavior.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

harsh scoring and tests that feel unfair.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Lots of , and frequent quizzes or tests are commonly reported.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

, and hard to learn from, though a if you work hard.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests, sample exams, pop quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

as , and harsh, with some praise for effort-based fairness and office hours.

Main concern

, and unprofessional personal remarks.

What students said

“Rude. Harsh, horrible grader. .”
MATH40
“he literally commented on my weight. that was highly unprofessional”
MATH40
“His notes are perfect. And exams.”
MATH42

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often described as hard, textbook-misaligned, and high-stakes with little student-friendly flexibility.

Test heavyCustom tests not from textbookPop quizzesHarsh grading

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or lectures and graded harshly.

Test heavyCustom examsPop quizzes
“Creates his own tests that once again, dont follow the textbook we are told to purchase.”
MATH40
“He is the teacher that gives you the in the book”
55B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He is the . !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 in-person , and professionalism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ and disorganized . He focuses on students that seem to understand the material.”

⚠️ Professionalism

15/100

“he literally commented on my weight. that was highly unprofessional and it made me uncomfortable.”

📉 Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📝

22/100

“Rude. . ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures dont follow textbook
  • His lectures never coincide with the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • Will humiliate you and pick on you during class
  • Tries to put everyone down with his insults
  • makes girls feel uncomfortable

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-one reviews spanning many years show a consistent negative majority with a smaller positive minority.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

MATH406 reviews
MATH1075 reviews
MATH42A5 reviews
MATH334 reviews
MATH553 reviews
Show 6 more courses
MATH422 reviews
STAT42A2 reviews
55B1 review
MATH391 review
MATH4O1 review
PROB42A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather_Not_Say 1