AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nidia Gonzalinajec

MATH39 · MATH40 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if , and ; skip if you need a polished, always-on lecturer.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra Credit LifelineClear Grading PathCaring but UnevenLots of Labs and QuizzesShow Up or Struggle
  • , and dropped low quizzes that make an A reachable with steady work.
  • , and practice tests matter.
  • One strong , and students correcting examples.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

An A is realistic if you do labs, practice tests, and and , but it is not free.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content is standard college math with weekly quizzes and and walkthroughs.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and stress that missing lectures hurts because tests track notes and labs.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Four of and grade help, tempered by one very negative experience.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Drops several lowest quizzes and clear criteria.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Weekly quizzes, labs, multiple midterms, practice tests, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Many call her the and caring, while one report cites confusion, delays, and corrected examples.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final project.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person Math 39/40 with , and ; attendance usually matters and one student found teaching basics unreliable.

Main concern

Inconsistent teaching quality and slow responses for some students.

What students said

“As long as you study, do the labs, and the .”
MATH39
“Mrs. G was the .”
MATH40
“I'm not exaggerating when I say that students had to correct her on every example she did.”
MATH39

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes track notes and but .

Practice-test extra creditQuizzes every weekMultiple midtermsTests tied to notes and labs

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests and quizzes follow notes, labs, and .

Practice-test extra creditWeekly quizzesFour midtermsNotes-and-labs based tests
“ and labs too”
MATH39
“ , and a ”
MATH40

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“As long as you study, do the labs, and the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning early-mid 2018, blending majority praise with one severe outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Mrs. G was the .”

🎁 Path

72/100

“she will add if you do the ”

⚠️ Inconsistent Basics

35/100

“students had to correct her on every example she did”

👍

78/100

“Amazing teacher who cares about her students and goes the extra mile”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she gave out printed notes where you guys go through together
  • She walked you through everything you needed to know
  • she can fumbles sometimes but its nothing big

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • She drops around 5 of
  • so get them all done

Theme 3

❤️ About Support and Character

  • wants her students to learn and pass
  • A great model for those looking to major in Education
  • very absent minded

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed 2018 reviews with mixed but mostly consistent themes; small sample and older dates limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH394 reviews
MATH401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values