AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Teri Henson

HENSON06459 · MATH50 · 32246MATH · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the material and can handle a heavy workload for modest grades.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of HomeworkTough GraderMandatory AttendanceSelf-Taught FeelHard Exams
  • and .
  • and lectures often feel weak or nonexistent.
  • Students say you need prior knowledge or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Grades cluster around B and C+, and students say you must work hard just for a C, not a free A.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Students call it harder than Math 55 alternatives, with difficult exams and heavy content load.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as mandatory and warn that skipping means you will not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and repeated worst-class or never-again comments.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

and warnings that only prior knowledge gets you through.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Repeated LOTS OF and comments about ton of handouts and way too much work.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few say she simplifies math, but most report horrible teaching style, , or student-corrected errors.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Heavy homework plus difficult exams both drive the grade, with .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH50-style classes feel overloaded with , and weak lectures, with many students calling it harder than expected and .

Main concern

, and little teaching support if .

What students said

“SHE GIVES OUT A BUNCH OF .”
MATH50
“ if you already know the material. That's the only way you'll pass.”
HENSON06459
“hella hard and is basically self taught there are .”
32246MATH

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as difficult and require serious studying, with .

Difficult In-Person ExamsMust Study HeavilySome Test Corrections

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person exams are hard and study-heavy; .

Difficult ExamsStudy RequiredTest Corrections Allowed
“you must study for the exams.”
MATH50
“70% of the class failed a test, but .”
HENSON06459

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you already know the material. That's the only way you'll pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 , and weak lecture support. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚

18/100

“SHE GIVES OUT A BUNCH OF .”

🚫 Low Recommendation

12/100

“ unless really know the material”

🧑‍🏫 Weak Teaching Support

28/100

“hella hard and is basically self taught there are .”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you want a C for a grade, work for it.
  • I found this class more difficult than Math 55.
  • !

Theme 2

📝 About Workload

  • Beware of the handouts because you will get a TON!!
  • Gives a lot of homework!!!
  • It was just way too much work.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Teaching style is horrible!
  • Constantly being corrected by the students!
  • Im usually really bad at math but she made the material simple.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistent in-person reviews from 2016-2017 align on heavy work and poor experience, but the sample is small and somewhat dated.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH503 reviews
32246MATH1 review
HENSON064591 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values