AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Paul De Mange

MATH65 · MATH20 · MATH33 · MATH55 · MATH44 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Solid pick for developmental math if you , and use the .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFunny Math TeacherGrades on a CurveDrops Lowest ExamOnline HomeworkAttendance Matters
  • Many students who struggle with , and fair with curves and dropped exams.
  • Daily classwork and ; and textbooks are frequently unused.
  • A minority say he mostly copies the book and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

, and , but students still say you must study several hours and attend to earn an A.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is developmental math taught efficiently with reviews, though pace can feel fast and tests require prep.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or that daily classwork means showing up is important.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and patience despite mixed teaching-style complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

74/100

, and gives credit for effort.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

; not featherlight, not crushing.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Often called funny, patient, and methods are weak.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Online homework and and curved.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students mostly praise a goofy, , and rewards attendance and effort, with a few complaints that lectures can be book-copying or .

Main concern

if .

What students said

“Loved this professor! He's easy going, wants students to succeed., and gives credit for effort.”
MATH65
“He does a review and the . He also adjusts the test scores based on what people got.”
MATH55
“Basically, all he does is copy the book onto the board.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can be hard, but , and a dropped low score soften the impact.

Review Before ExamsGraded on a CurveDrops Lowest ExamIn-Person Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students report , and that tests can still be difficult.

Review Before ExamsGraded on a CurveDrops Lowest Exam
“He does a review and the . He also adjusts the test scores based on what people got.”
MATH55
“Just make sure you study for the tests because they're really difficult.”
MATH44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have always been awful at math and for the first time I am successful. and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews, highlighting fairness, humor, and effort-for-grade tradeoffs. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“As someone who hasn't excelled at math, his class was understandable and relatively entertaining.”

⚖️

74/100

“He does a review and the . He also adjusts the test scores based on what people got.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • DeMange has this like renegade, modern hippy style with corny math jokes.
  • He's a character, but a good teacher and a .
  • Basically, all he does is copy the book onto the board.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and he grades on a curve.
  • Drops lowest exam of 4 & graded on a curve.
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews spanning 2008-2016 with , and mixed lecture quality.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 55
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH556 reviews
MATH204 reviews
MATH653 reviews
MATH331 review
MATH441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values