AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Cynthia Keune

MATH1A · MATH42A · MATH3 · MATHSTAT · MATH65A · MATH65 · MATH1 · MATH34 · MATHH44 · MATH20 · MATH42 · MATH2 · FINITMATH · CALC1 · MATH44 · MATH3334 · STATS44 · MATHV · 56 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid if ; only consider her if and already have a strong math background.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCannot Explain ConceptsMust Self-TeachStay AwayConfusing Board WorkHard Exams
  • Dominant theme is that and students must teach themselves.
  • , and graded tightly even with small curves.
  • A and if they already know the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many , and needing to learn nearly all material alone to have any shot at a strong grade.

; no online reviews exist.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Students repeatedly call the experience hard and confusing beyond normal course difficulty because .

; no online reviews exist.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

, though some note long boring lectures and early dismissals with .

; no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

The large majority urge students to stay away and switch professors whenever possible.

; no online reviews exist.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students describe hard grading, limited curves after mass fails, and little .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly homework plus frequent hard quizzes and chapter exams leave students overloaded while .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most reviews say she cannot teach clearly, makes mistakes, and relies on .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Success hinges on hard quizzes and tests that many say do not match class examples, with .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math and stats sections are widely described as , and high-fail risk, with only occasional praise for niceness or office-hour help.

Main concern

, and high chance of failing or dropping.

What students said

“ . Doesn't introduce concepts.”
MATH20
“This class will require you to teach yourself.”
MATH20
“ ! STAY AWAY UNLESS YOU WANT TO FAIL.”
MATH20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are often long, hard, and poorly aligned with lectures, though a few sections allow formula sheets or note cards.

Hard In-Person TestsFormula Sheet SometimesMisaligned With Lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard and disconnected from lectures; limited note-card or formula help appears only sometimes.

Hard In-Person TestsFormula Sheet SometimesPractice Exams Sometimes
“QUIZZES AND WE LEARN IN CLASS.”
MATH20
“ and hard. You must know the info. But she and allows you the use of a test note-card.”
MATHSTAT
“Will let you use a small formula sheet to write all the formulas required for the exam.”
MATH3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! STAY AWAY UNLESS YOU WANT TO FAIL.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative teaching themes and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

20/100

“Does not grasp the concept of teaching.”

📚

24/100

“This class will require you to teach yourself.”

📉 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“STAY AWAY UNLESS YOU WANT TO FAIL.”

🧪

34/100

“QUIZZES AND WE LEARN IN CLASS.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't introduce concepts.
  • Ask her a question and she tells you to read the book.
  • She only teaches off of her little notepad

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • everyone failed so she gave everyone 10 extra points
  • To get an A on her tests, I had to personally study 95% of the material.
  • when the whole class is getting F's there is a problem with the teacher

Theme 3

⚠️ About Warnings

  • HORRIBLE TEACHER STAY AWAY SERIOUSLY!!
  • This teacher should get fired.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

56

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews over many years and hard testing, with only a small positive minority.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 518
1 out of 522

Course coverage

MATH209 reviews
MATH18 reviews
MATH447 reviews
MATH26 reviews
MATH32 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH342 reviews
MATH652 reviews
MATH65A2 reviews
MATHSTAT2 reviews
11 review
CALC11 review
FINITMATH1 review
MATH1A1 review
MATH33341 review
MATH421 review
MATH42A1 review
MATHH441 review
MATHV1 review
STATS441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values