AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Brenda Weak

MATH42A · MATH42B · ALGEBRA2 · MATH34 · MATH1 · MATH65B · MATH20 · MATH42 · MATH55 · MATH44 · MATH38 · TRIG36 · MATH45 · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid if ; only take if you can teach yourself from the book and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesBoring StyleLots of HomeworkHard TestsOffice Hours Helpful
  • , and boring.
  • Heavy ungraded homework and ; .
  • A minority praise proofs, office hours, and A if .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some report easy A with and answer book, but many need outside help or struggle for C despite effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content feels hard largely because lectures confuse and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; one student says attend, take notes, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

few positive calculus intro reviews.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

; quizzes can be easy and help, but as hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of and labs.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Repeated themes of boring lectures, board mistakes, and and proofs.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and quizzes support grades but and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

24 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

; some say do homework and office hours for a decent grade.

Main concern

and tests feel harder than practice.

What students said

“Definitely the . She doesn't clearly explain concepts.”
MATH38
“ ! I worked and got an A but had .”
TRIG36
“She doesn't grade it, just makes sure you completed it - make sure you actually do all of the homework and buy the answer book to CHECK your answers. I did this and easily got an A.”
MATH34

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are often hard and ; notes not allowed per some students, while .

Hard TestsHardest Homework Problems on TestsNo Notes on TestsEasy Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes no notes; quizzes may be easy and homework-linked.

Hard TestsNo Notes on TestsEasy QuizzesHomework Helps Exams
“Her tests were extemly difficult, and she picks out the .”
MATH1
“she doesn't let and expects you to remember all the formulas.”
MATH42A
“ . She even will tell you if you're right or wrong before you submit it.”
MATH1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If so at all costs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2012, highlighting teaching clarity and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

😕

35/100

“Definitely the . She doesn't clearly explain concepts.”

📚

28/100

“She gives quite a the exams.”

🚫 Low Recommendation

28/100

“ .”

📝

35/100

“Her tests were extemly difficult, and she picks out the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • BORING, MAKES LOTS OF MISTAKES
  • teaches straight out of the book pretty much word for word

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I worked and got an A but had .
  • I did this and easily got an A.
  • barely passed with a C

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • and tries to help people when they have questions
  • She means well, but her style of teaching is horrible.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

24 detailed in-person reviews spanning 2005-2012 with consistent themes of and .

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH15 reviews
MATH42A4 reviews
MATH443 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH342 reviews
Show 8 more courses
ALGEBRA21 review
MATH381 review
MATH421 review
MATH42B1 review
MATH451 review
MATH551 review
MATH65B1 review
TRIG361 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values