AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Inkelis

MATH65 · MATH152 · MATH65B · MATH55A · MATH55 · MATH44 · ALG55 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the algebra material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf Teach ClassStrict RulesNo CalculatorsFast PacedInsults Students
  • .
  • Strict classroom rules (no calculators, gum, yawning) and often rude tone.
  • and daily quizzes; a if you already know the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

A few who already know the material call it easy; most .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast pace, no calculators, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

, and yelling and conduct control.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Vast ; isolated fans like structure but do not outweigh the warnings.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report strict rules, unfair feel, daily quizzes, and little flexibility on makeups.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Lots of online homework, group work, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

22/100

, and self-teach class.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Practice tests and chapter tests matter most; and sometimes not collected.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and self-teaching; rare praise for routine and practice tests.

Main concern

You pay to teach yourself under strict, sometimes demeaning classroom rules.

What students said

“ ... worse teacher i hav ever had in my entire life....”
MATH55
“The only people who do well in her class are people who already know the material.”
MATH55
“If you have her your basically paying to teach yourself.”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams can mirror practice tests but are often brutal with no calculators; some allow a notes page.

Practice Tests SimilarNo CalculatorsDaily QuizzesNote Page Allowed Sometimes

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

students but feel brutal with no calculators.

Practice Tests SimilarNo CalculatorsDaily QuizzesNotes Page Sometimes
“She gives you practice tests that are very similar to the real exams.”
MATH55
“she doesn't let you use calculators”
MATH55
“she lets you use a page of notes for every quiz and test. (inc. final)”
MATH55A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have her your basically paying to teach yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 in-person reviews, highlighting self-teaching demands and strict climate. Credibility rating: High.

🚫 Teaching Disaster

22/100

“ .”

📖

22/100

“If you have her your basically paying to teach yourself.”

⛔ Strict Classroom Rules

20/100

“YOU CANT EVEN YAWN!!!”

👎 Low Recommendation

18/100

“ ... worse teacher i hav ever had in my entire life....”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she doesnt teach she make students teach themselves
  • Her teaching method is her weakness.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • only people who do well ... already know the material
  • assigns a ton of homework and never collects it
  • .

Theme 3

😠 About Classroom Climate

  • She insults students in front of the class
  • no food, even for diabetics. no yawning. no calculators
  • enjoys mocking and insulting the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

29 in-person reviews from 2004-2012 with highly consistent negative themes and detailed anecdotes.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 511
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH5517 reviews
MATH657 reviews
ALG551 review
MATH1521 review
MATH441 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH55A1 review
MATH65B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values