AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Eric Langendorff

MATHMATH · MATH55 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; students report , and very high fail rates.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerConfusing lecturesIrrelevant materialHigh fail ratePlays favoritesHarsh on late work
  • All four reviews rate quality 1 and difficulty 5 with zero praise.
  • Students say lectures and and material is over-hard or irrelevant.
  • Multiple reports of mass failure and a class designed so students fail.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Students report mass failure, no forgiveness on late work, and exams disconnected from class content, so an A is extremely hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Reviews say he makes the class harder than it needs to be and covers material beyond what is required.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

review.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Every review is strongly negative and students explicitly say good luck or they are truly sorry if you have him.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Not forgiving on late work and students feel the class is set up for failure.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Labs and exams are described as excessive and harder than needed for the course level.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students say he confuses simple math, is unprepared, and teaches irrelevant content.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Complaints center on tests and in class.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and tests that do not match class content, with many peers failing.

Main concern

High fail rate and material that other math faculty called irrelevant to what was tested.

What students said

“TERRIBLE teacher. Has no idea what he's talking about.... more than 75% of my class failed.”
MATH55
“Nothing we learned in class had to do with what was on the test.”
MATH55
“I feel like the class was meant for students to fail.”
MATH55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and labs are described as mismatched to lectures and designed to make students fail.

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and labs were called irrelevant to class material by students and other math faculty.

Mismatched examsHard labsHigh fail rate
“Nothing we learned in class had to do with what was on the test.”
MATH55
“Other math and labs and said that the information we were learning was completely irrelevant.”
MATH55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you have him I AM TRUELY SORRY.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting confusion, fail rates, and fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Disaster

8/100

“He .”

📉 High Fail Rate

8/100

“more than 75% of my class failed.”

🚫

5/100

“I feel like the class was meant for students to fail.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He .
  • Has no idea what he's talking about.
  • Dimwit if you ask me.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • more than 75% of my class failed
  • Nothing we learned in class had to do with what was on the test.
  • I feel like the class was meant for students to fail.

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • He is not forgiving when it comes to turning things in late.
  • He plays favorites with different students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Four fully consistent negative reviews from 2010-2011, but the sample is small and over a decade old.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH553 reviews
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values