AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Harut Martirosyan

YEUEU · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; the only available comment is a serious misconduct warning.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSingle-review red flagInappropriate conduct claimTough grader tagHigh difficultyAvoid
  • Only one online review exists, and it is extremely negative.
  • Student alleges inappropriate behavior toward women and rates quality 1 of 5.
  • No corroborating reviews, so evidence is thin but the stated experience is severe.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

The only review tags him as a and a 1 quality score, offering no path to an easy A.

All evidence is from the single online review; no in-person data exists.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Difficulty is rated 5 of 5 with tags for .

Evidence comes only from one online review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

The as not mandatory, but that does not offset the severe overall warning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

and the only comment is a .

Recommendation evidence is limited to one online review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

grading.

Format shift

Based solely on the single online review.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Tags include so .

Format shift

Workload signals come only from one online review.

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Quality rating of 1 with a misconduct allegation indicates a disastrous student experience.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

So , but details are extremely limited.

Format shift

Inferred only from the single online review tags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The sole online review gives a quality 1 rating and alleges terrible, inappropriate behavior toward women.

Main concern

and heavy-paper tags with no positive counterbalance.

What students said

“Terrible and inappropriate towards women”
yeueu

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Insufficient exam detail

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

The single online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Terrible and inappropriate towards women”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 online review with . Credibility rating: Low.

🚨 Conduct Warning

5/100

“Terrible and inappropriate towards women”

📉 Quality Floor

5/100

“Professor QUALITY rating: 1”

📚 Workload Signal

20/100

“So many papers”

Theme 1

⚠️ About Conduct

  • Terrible and inappropriate towards women

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • So many papers

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one short review with no corroboration, limited course detail, and no time-series consistency.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

yeueu1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1