AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Vincent Lee

MATH240 · MATH263 · MATH125 · MATH262 · MATH245 · CALCII · CALC2 · CAL262 · CALCULUS1 · MATH227 · MATH260 · 241 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
59.83%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and accept that exams, not homework, decide your grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing Math ProfTest HeavyTough GraderSelf-Study HeavyClear When You Connect
  • some call him the run away.
  • Grade is driven by a and scarce .
  • Expect ; lectures help some and feel too slow or empty to others.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible with full effort, but often denied, and .

Both formats stress tough exams; online and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Calc content is demanding and paced poorly for winter or accelerated terms, so many rely on YouTube or the textbook.

Online and in-person both report high conceptual load; accelerated terms feel especially brutal.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and some warn lectures still cover little useful material.

Mandatory shows up in both formats; a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

About six in and strong avoid warnings from others.

Recommendation is mixed in both formats; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

27/100

Many call him a and gives little partial credit.

Format shift

Harsh grading appears in both formats; a minority of .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Daily graded homework is not the main load; the real grind is .

Format shift

Online often has ungraded homework that still must be done to pass exams.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

He is patient and clear for some students, but others find lectures slow, wrong, or pure textbook recitation.

Format shift

Polarization is strong online and in person; praise clusters around clarity and care, complaints around pace and preparation.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are often based on a handful of .

Format shift

Online reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

generous partial credit to mandatory slow lectures students call useless.

Main concern

Mandatory attendance paired with uneven lecture quality and .

What students said

“a and homework and understandable teaching”
CALCULUS1
“He is an and gives virtually no partial credit”
MATH263
“Lectures are useless and he gets questions wrong completely.”
MATH263

Remote format

Online

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections feel convenient when organized well, but many say lectures are textbook recitation, , and require heavy outside study.

Main concern

and weak email response leaves little recovery if you fall behind.

What students said

“Graded by only 4 exams & he's a . ”
MATH263
“Expect to learn concepts on your own from the textbook or online.”
MATH263
“ ”
MATH262

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

homework, and offer little safety net.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsHarder Than HomeworkLimited Extra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and often graded strictly for method, not only the .

Strict Method MatchingHarsh Partial CreditHigh Stakes
“if your work makes no sense you will get 0 points”
MATH262
“even if the steps and answers are right he gives it a zero”
CALC2

Online

Online sections commonly grade only a and little email support.

Four ExamsNo Curve MentionedExtra Credit Rare
“All you have is 4 exams to take to make your grade.”
CALCULUS1
“Graded on 4 tests with NO offered this semester.”
MATH263

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in the effort and time, you should have no problem receiving a solid grade in this class. Homework prepares you well for the exams... Although the pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and in-person calculus sections, highlighting the . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“the most amazing lectures. and make it simple. don't miss taking him”

⚖️

27/100

“He finds . Even if your answer is correct he will still mark it wrong”

📚

34/100

“I had to learn 90% of the course through my textbook.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“I have now taken 5 college math classes and he is the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He never got tired of explaining the same thing over and over
  • He just started doing problems from the homework. What the hell is this?
  • and he doesn't waste too much time on abstract material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but he is a
  • all of those ratings are like a trap.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Risk Factors

  • 90% of the class dropped it because of him
  • unless you plan on reading just the cal 2 textbook

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

241

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews across many years and both formats show a consistent polarized pattern, so the signal is strong.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5112
4 out of 510
3 out of 520
2 out of 531
1 out of 568

Course coverage

MATH26319 reviews
MATH26211 reviews
CALC25 reviews
MATH1254 reviews
CAL2622 reviews
Show 6 more courses
CALCULUS12 reviews
MATH2402 reviews
MATH2602 reviews
CALCII1 review
MATH2271 review
MATH2451 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 2 · A 13 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 1 · B 10

C range

5

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 2

D range

2

D 2

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 7