AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Nilli Sow

MATH263 · STATS227 · MATH245 · M110 · MATH261 · CALC2 · MATH110 · NIG0666 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
56.25%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you , and use study guides; personality fit is highly mixed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardLots of HomeworkTest HeavyMixed WarmthStudy Guide HelpfulCamera On Online
  • , and end-of-term homework flexibility.
  • , and high drop rates.
  • , and as mandatory.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

and study guides help, but and heavy testing make an A effortful.

Online camera rules add stress; and A+ still appear when students keep up.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Calc and stats content plus fast lectures keep intellectual demand high.

Both formats call the math hard; online adds self-teaching complaints for some.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and warn that missing class hurts badly.

Online camera attendance is stricter; a .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

Roughly half would take again; experiences range .

Recent online calc praise is warmer than several older harsh reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

; others say he takes points off for small mistakes.

Format shift

Online opinions are more extreme both ways than in person.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and end-of-term homework dumps are recurring.

Format shift

; online volume complaints are especially loud.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

Fans say he is brilliant, caring, and clear; critics say he reads the book, rushes, or belittles students.

Format shift

Online has both strongest praise and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Multiple exams, finals, and .

Format shift

Online camera exams are explicit; in person uses frequent tests and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students note dedication and preview exams, but also fast lectures, costly course sites, and .

Main concern

Fast pace, frequent testing, and .

What students said

“He offers a changed numbers).”
MATH261
“90% of my class dropped his class, even students who really tried- dropped!”
STATS227
“If you know math Ill be easy . If .”
MATH110

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews swing from outstanding supportive calc teaching to claims of , and camera-on exams.

Main concern

, and occasional rude interactions.

What students said

“ . Take his class, TRUST ME”
MATH262
“ , if not he discredits you.”
math125
“He is horrible at teaching content, he just goes over exactly what's in the textbook.”
CALC2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and can be camera-proctored online, though study guides often mirror tests.

Camera On OnlineStudy Guides Near IdenticalMultiple ExamsPartial Credit for Effort

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person testing is frequent with ; .

Preview ExamsFrequent TestsHomework Site
“He offers a changed numbers).”
MATH261
“You MUST do a daily graded homework.”
STATS227

Online

Several online reviews report camera-on exams and .

Camera OnStudy Guides Match ExamsAttendance On Camera
“ .”
MATH262
“ , if not he discredits you.”
math125

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting supportive teaching versus workload and tone concerns. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Praise

54/100

“Professor Sow changed my outlook on math. He's incredible.”

📚 Heavy Workload

26/100

“ so be prepared to take most of the chapters or all of them.”

📷 Online Proctoring

35/100

“ , if not he discredits you.”

⭐ Recommendation Split

50/100

“Please, do yourself a favor and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's brilliant and caring, and so incredibly kind.
  • he just goes over exactly what's in the textbook.
  • !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Study guides are practically identical to the exams.
  • mistake but does give points to those who try
  • 90% of my class dropped his class

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Good professor. Lectures were online and a bit slow but
  • he told me, "what are you doing here, if you're not trying, go get a job".
  • Very Professional, and however many times you need.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen reviews over years show consistent workload and testing themes but sharply mixed tone and smaller sample than ideal.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH2613 reviews
CALC22 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
STATS2272 reviews
M1101 review
Show 6 more courses
math1251 review
MATH2271 review
MATH2451 review
MATH2621 review
math2631 review
NIG06661 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 2 · A 4

B range

2

B 2

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1