AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Anahit Asadyan

MATH54 · M262W · M262SUMMER · MATH261 · CALC24S · CALC2 · M270 · CALCULUSII · CALCII · CALC1 · M270SP · M227FALL · PRECALC260 · MATH262FALL · M236S · CALC24W · SRATI227 · MATH270F · M262SU · MATH260 · MATH263 · CALCIISP · MATH270S · CALCULUS2 · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH270 · 145 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
72.92%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want to truly learn calculus and will grind homework; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lecturesCaring mentorStrict examsAnti-cheating focusHeavy homework
  • Students praise crystal-clear explanations and patience with questions.
  • partial credit or curve.
  • Online sections draw more cheating-accusation and proctoring stress complaints.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

, but , and can erase a semester of solid work.

Online reviews emphasize proctored .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

, yet calculus and linear algebra remain intellectually demanding for most students.

Lower-level stats or precalc feel easier; Calc II stays tough in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

as mandatory and note participation matters.

Only a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

73/100

Strong teaching praise and roughly three-quarters would-take-again support a yes for motivated learners.

In-person love is steadier; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

36/100

Multiple students report little partial credit, no rounding, and .

Format shift

Online students especially cite no curve and cheating-related grade hits.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

and sometimes long.

Format shift

; online adds timed platform exams.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Dominant theme is clear, patient, engaging lectures from a professor who wants students to succeed.

Format shift

In-person teaching reputation is strongest; online still has fans but more friction.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; homework is practice for high-stakes tests.

Format shift

and proctored exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly describe her as , and excellent at breaking down math, with .

Main concern

and low partial credit can hurt even diligent students.

What students said

“She is an amazing instructor to have for math. She makes math digestible.”
MATH262
“She is a real gem. and personable. Her lectures are extremely well managed.”
M236S
“many of my friends and and not reflective of .”
calc1

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and harsh proctored exams, cheating callouts, and tough timing.

Main concern

Webcam or .

What students said

“Requires zoom+proctored site for exams.”
CALC2
“webcam on for test”
CalcII
“Professor Asadyan is one of the . and I usually didn't need any other materials for the class.”
CALC2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, with online proctoring and strict integrity enforcement.

Proctored online examsWebcam requiredCheat sheet sometimes allowedHarder than homeworkLittle partial credit

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

some classes, and tests that can still feel much harder than homework.

Multiple midtermsNote cards sometimesHomework-aligned or harder than HW
“She lets you because she knows that we cannot memorize everything.”
MATH227
“many of my friends and and not reflective of .”
calc1

Online

Online comments explicitly mention Zoom or webcam proctoring, Cengage tests, and cheating callouts.

Webcam onZoom proctoredCengage testsNo notebooks sometimes
“Requires zoom+proctored site for exams.”
CALC2
“ camera Calls out students”
CalcII
“She did not allow notebooks for tests but allowed flashcards for formulas.”
MATH261

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a real gem. and personable. Her lectures are extremely well managed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 math reviews across online and in-person calculus and stats, credibility High.

🎯 Teaching Clarity

80/100

“She seems to have a gift for explaining difficult topics very well, and her passion for the subject made me enjoy it more, too!”

📝

38/100

“accuses anyone of cheating for no reason with no proof. more concerned about finding cheaters than helping her students pass.”

❤️ Student Care

85/100

“She's one of the sweetest and caring professors! and understandable and she doesn't mind if you ask a lot of questions.”

👍 Recommendation

73/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She makes math digestible.
  • Always making sure everyone understand before moving on.
  • , and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • She says but she never did.
  • Unless you have a super strong foundation from Calc 1, DO NOT TAKE HER.

Theme 3

📷

  • Requires zoom+proctored site for exams.
  • webcam on for test
  • she cares more about catching students cheat than actually teaching.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

145

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with rich detail, multi-year span, and recurring themes on teaching quality versus exam strictness yield high credibility.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 578
4 out of 533
3 out of 58
2 out of 58
1 out of 518

Course coverage

CalcII6 reviews
MATH2626 reviews
calc15 reviews
CALC24 reviews
MATH2273 reviews
Show 22 more courses
MATH2613 reviews
M262Summer2 reviews
Math2702 reviews
Calc24S1 review
Calc24W1 review
CALCIISP1 review
Calculus21 review
CalculusII1 review
M227FALL1 review
M236S1 review
M262SU1 review
M262W1 review
m2701 review
M270SP1 review
MATH2601 review
math262Fall1 review
math2631 review
Math270F1 review
Math270S1 review
math541 review
PRECALC2601 review
srati2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

6

B+ 2 · B 4

C range

4

C 4

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3