AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Quincy Singleton

ADDICST001 · PSY101 · PSYCH2 · PSY068 · ADDICST85 · PSYCH001 · 57 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
73.21%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want an engaging psych class and will write original work without AI; if AI flags or heated class dynamics stress you out.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturesAnti-AI StrictInspirationalExtra CreditParticipation Heavy
  • Most students call him one of the if you show up, participate, and .
  • A loud minority report harsh false plagiarism or AI accusations, especially online.
  • Effort is rewarded with , and , not free grades.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

High grades are common if you participate and submit original work, but AI or .

Online complaints about AI zeros are sharper; in-person students more often say just show up and participate for an A.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Intro psych is manageable with reading and discussion, though some sections feel bio-heavy or emotionally challenging.

Both formats call content doable; difficulty spikes when writing scrutiny is high.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and say participation is central to succeeding.

A few older or , but majority still treat showing up as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and growth, while a vocal minority urge total avoidance over AI accusations.

Recent positive wave is strong in both formats; 2023-2024 AI-accusation cluster is the main drag.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Many call him fair with and resubmits, but and plagiarism enforcement.

Format shift

Online reviews report harsher AI .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Expect reading, discussions, papers, and participation; some sections have lots of .

Format shift

Workload intensity varies more by course than by online versus in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

Most students praise engaging, caring, real-life lectures; negatives focus more on enforcement style than lecture quality.

Format shift

Teaching praise is strong in both formats when students are not in plagiarism disputes.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Assessment mixes participation, discussions, papers, quizzes or tests, and .

Format shift

and ; others keep tests and discussions.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

and growth, with some stress around heated discussions and tough plagiarism enforcement.

Main concern

Classroom climate can feel intense, and some students report being put on the spot or accused of plagiarism.

What students said

“Prof. , and humor made me fall in love with psychology.”
PSYCH001
“The . This is the first class I have dropped in my life”
PSYCH2
“ but u have since the beginning of the semester to work on.”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students either love his engaging Zoom style and and plagiarism accusations.

Main concern

Multiple students say he zeros work for .

What students said

“I've had him for 3 courses and .”
PSYCH001
“Wrongly accuses people of using AI and gives a zero with no compensation.”
PSY101
“Just show up on zoom and enjoy the class, it's amazing.”
PSYCH2

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

work is often effort-based and doable, but AI or plagiarism accusations create high-stakes downside.

Participation HeavyWriting AssignmentsAI DetectionExtra CreditSome No Final

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments describe discussions, notes-based tests, and ; proctoring software is not clearly described.

In-Class DiscussionNotes Help On TestsMajor Paper OptionParticipation Required
“ but u have since the beginning of the semester to work on.”
PSY101
“Most important thing is take good notes they will basically give you all the answers to the tests.”
PSY101

Online

Online comments , and frequent AI or plagiarism checks without proven proctoring software details.

Zoom ParticipationAI ChecksWriting AssignmentsTests From Slides
“ as long as you don't use AI.”
PSYCH001
“ as an online class. He accused me of plagiarism and refused to show me what exactly I plagiarized.”
PSY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've had him for 3 courses and . He has an awesome personality. Bad reviews are from people that didn't do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 psychology reviews, balancing strong lecture praise with AI-enforcement controversies. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“Prof. , and humor made me fall in love with psychology.”

⚠️ AI Enforcement Risk

35/100

“Wrongly accuses people of using AI and gives a zero with no compensation.”

👍 Recommendation

74/100

“Professors like Mr. Quincy are one in a !”

📝

64/100

“Just show up to class, do your work, and don't cheat. It's really that simple.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wonderful teacher. .
  • He really helps us understand addiction.
  • class never felt like class, but a very educational hangout

Theme 2

🤖 About AI and Plagiarism

  • He HATES AI and will confront students that use it
  • Wrongly accuses people of using AI and gives a zero with no compensation
  • Don't submit ai generated work(he checks)

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is fair, reasonable, and flexible
  • , and attentive
  • One of my top 5 professors of all time !!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

57

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed reviews with a large recent cluster and consistent praise-versus-AI-accusation themes make the picture highly credible.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 514

Course coverage

PSYCH00117 reviews
PSY10114 reviews
PSYCH28 reviews
AddicSt0014 reviews
PSY0684 reviews
Show 2 more courses
196262 reviews
AddicSt851 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

30

A+ 6 · A 23 · A- 1

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5