Is this an easy A?
FairEffort
64/100High grades are common if you participate and submit original work, but AI or .
Online complaints about AI zeros are sharper; in-person students more often say just show up and participate for an A.
ADDICST001 · PSY101 · PSYCH2 · PSY068 · ADDICST85 · PSYCH001 · 57 lifetime ratings
The decision
Key questions
Is this an easy A?
High grades are common if you participate and submit original work, but AI or x x x x x x x x.
Online complaints about AI zeros are sharper; in-person students more often say just show up and participate for an A.
Is the course easy?
Intro psych is manageable with reading and discussion, though some sections feel bio-heavy or emotionally challenging.
Both formats call content doable; difficulty spikes when writing scrutiny is high.
Is attendance flexible?
x x x x x and say participation is central to succeeding.
A few older or x x x x x x x, but majority still treat showing up as required.
Is this professor recommended?
x x x x x x and growth, while a vocal minority urge total avoidance over AI accusations.
Recent positive wave is strong in both formats; 2023-2024 AI-accusation cluster is the main drag.
Course guide
Grading
Fair
58/100
Many call him fair with x x and resubmits, but x x x x x and plagiarism enforcement.
Format shift
Online reviews report harsher AI x x x x x x.
Workload
Moderate
48/100
Expect reading, discussions, papers, and participation; some sections have lots of x x x x x x.
Format shift
Workload intensity varies more by course than by online versus in-person.
Teaching experience
Good
76/100
Most students praise engaging, caring, real-life lectures; negatives focus more on enforcement style than lecture quality.
Format shift
Teaching praise is strong in both formats when students are not in plagiarism disputes.
Assessment method
Balanced
48/100
Assessment mixes participation, discussions, papers, quizzes or tests, and x x x x x x x x.
Format shift
x x x x x x and x x; others keep tests and discussions.
Luni fit check
Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.
Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.
Course format
Classroom format
High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner
x x x x x x x and growth, with some stress around heated discussions and tough plagiarism enforcement.
Main concern
Classroom climate can feel intense, and some students report being put on the spot or accused of plagiarism.
What students said
“Prof. x x x x x x, and humor made me fall in love with psychology.”
“The x x x x x x. This is the first class I have dropped in my life”
“x x x x x x x but u have since the beginning of the semester to work on.”
Remote format
High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward
Online students either love his engaging Zoom style and x x x x x x x x and plagiarism accusations.
Main concern
Multiple students say he zeros work for x x x x x.
What students said
“I've had him for 3 courses and x x x x x x.”
“Wrongly accuses people of using AI and gives a zero with no compensation.”
“Just show up on zoom and enjoy the class, it's amazing.”
Exam style
work is often effort-based and doable, but AI or plagiarism accusations create high-stakes downside.
Assessment risk
Standard
55/100
Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.
In-person comments describe discussions, notes-based tests, and x x x x x x x; proctoring software is not clearly described.
“x x x x x x x but u have since the beginning of the semester to work on.”
“Most important thing is take good notes they will basically give you all the answers to the tests.”
Online comments x x x x x x x x, and frequent AI or plagiarism checks without proven proctoring software details.
“x x x as long as you don't use AI.”
“x x x as an online class. He accused me of plagiarism and refused to show me what exactly I plagiarized.”
Student evidence
Top student voice
“I've had him for 3 courses and x x x x x x. He has an awesome personality. Bad reviews are from people that didn't do the work.”
“Prof. x x x x x x, and humor made me fall in love with psychology.”
“Wrongly accuses people of using AI and gives a zero with no compensation.”
“Professors like Mr. Quincy are one in a x x x x x x!”
“Just show up to class, do your work, and don't cheat. It's really that simple.”
Theme 1
Theme 2
Theme 3
Data context
Analysis sample
50
Recent reviews read by the AI
57
Lifetime ratings
88/100
Evidence confidence
Fifty detailed reviews with a large recent cluster and consistent praise-versus-AI-accusation themes make the picture highly credible.
Inside 50 stored ratings
Reported outcomes
48 reported outcomes
A+ 6 · A 23 · A- 1
B+ 3 · B 3
C+ 1
No reported values
No reported values
Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 5