AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Arutyun Karapetyan

MATH · MATH121 · STAT227 · MATH112 · MATH245 · MATH115 · MATH167 · MATH216 · STAT1 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH125 · 136 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
81.25%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Worth taking if you show up, do the , and ask questions; self-study backup .

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and caringTests match homeworkExtra credit availableAccent can confuseAttendance matters
  • , and willing to help with and grade boosts.
  • A sizable minority report confusion, attitude issues, or unresponsive .
  • , and consistent Aleks or MyMathLab style work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Many As and grade rounding appear when students do HW and attend, but several say you must work hard and some get low grades.

Both formats can yield As with effort; and F outliers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Stats and algebra are manageable with practice for many, yet others find pace fast and lectures .

Online often feels average for independent learners; in-person difficulty reports swing widely.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Skip-class-you-wont-pass and mandatory tags are common; missing class is said to hurt performance.

; online also often lists mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Would-take-again around 81% and frequent strong praise outweigh a vocal minority of .

; online opinions are more mixed average.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

, tutoring boosts, rounding, and partial credit appear .

Format shift

In-person leniency evidence is strongest; as clear but not free.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Aleks or MyMathLab homework with multiple attempts is standard; some call it lots of .

Format shift

Online tags lots of ; in-person varies by term.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Humor, care, and , but accent, clarity, and consistency complaints persist.

Format shift

In-person has both glowing and harsh poles; online leans average with clarity split.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and and notes, with online HW as practice.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize tests aligned to homework; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

46 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many love humor, care, and ; .

Main concern

Missing class hurts, and a minority report harsh or .

What students said

“He taught VERY clearly and let us out a bit early sometimes.”
MATH227
“ questions.”
MATH227
“The professor's teaching style made the material difficult to follow.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online stats feels average to solid for independent learners; some praise clarity while others say English and Q&A limit teaching.

Main concern

Independent learning burden and uneven answers to questions.

What students said

“ , and teaches at the eye level of the students.”
MATH227
“he should not be a statistics teacher. He has trouble answering questions about the material”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Many students say tests mirror homework and .

Tests from homeworkAt-home tests mentionedFew questionsExtra creditClear grading criteria

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; one note mentions 4-day at-home tests on Aleks.

Homework mirrored testsAt-home Aleks testsShort examsGrade rounding
“He uses alerks for assignments and gives 4 days .”
STAT1
“ notes and very little ones, about 5-10.”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews describe standard stats assessment and ; .

Homework based prepTextbook and AI study aids
“Utilizing Unstuck ai alongside the textbook is a great way to prep for exams.”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He taught VERY clearly and let us out a bit early sometimes. He was also open to by simply attending tutoring at the PI Shop (Instant 5% grade boost).”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, capturing both strong praise and sharp criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“His lectures are the best. Professor Karapetyan is funny and enlightening.”

📝

82/100

“ questions.”

❤️ Student Support

80/100

“he genuinely cares about helping you pass.”

⚠️ Polarizing Clarity

35/100

“ , so I relied heavily on the textbook and outside resources”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very funny and easy to understand
  • accent which is hard to understand
  • teaches at the eye level of the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This wasn't an "easy A", but if you work properly,you'll get it
  • he would round your grade up

Theme 3

🧪

  • gives 4 days
  • HW was on Aleks math with unlimited attempts

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

136

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and recurring themes give strong confidence despite polarization.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 580
4 out of 59
3 out of 54
2 out of 510
1 out of 533

Course coverage

MATH22725 reviews
STAT2278 reviews
MATH1154 reviews
MATH1253 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1212 reviews
MATH1 review
MATH1121 review
MATH1671 review
MATH2161 review
MATH2451 review
STAT11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

26

A+ 12 · A 14

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 3

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1