AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Megan Khatoonabadi

MATH240 · MATH113 · MATH112 · STATS227 · MATH245 · MATH167 · MATH221 · MATH124A · MATH224 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH114 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
54.05%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her for lower math only if you will attend, do all online HW, and ; if you need lenient grading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough GraderTest HeavyExams Mismatch HomeworkCaring but SternMandatory Attendance
  • Strong for lower-level math when students attend and practice; much weaker for Stats and recent online sections.
  • and less aligned with and little partial credit.
  • Attendance and participation are treated as essential; skipping is repeatedly tied to failing.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

As are possible with and attendance, but , and hard mismatched exams block easy As.

Online MATH245 comments stress no partial credit and exam-HW mismatch; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Content ranges from approachable algebra to demanding Stats with fast lectures and abstract formulas.

Online reviews emphasize rushed pace; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and warn that skipping class means you will not pass.

Both online and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

strong yes for and recent online.

; online MATH245 and Stats are largely not.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

and no-partial-credit complaints dominate, with picky notation deductions.

Format shift

Online reviews especially stress zero partial credit; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Lots of , and test-heavy load appear across courses.

Format shift

; summer in-person sections feel especially intensive.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

, but rushed, confusing, or harsh for others.

Format shift

; recent online quality is much lower.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Tests and finals carry most weight; homework and activities .

Format shift

and in-person comments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and care in 112/113/124A, while Stats 227 often draws and stern tone.

Main concern

and exams that surprise .

What students said

“If you want an easy A but if you really want to ”
MATH167
“The and HW”
MATH227
“Great teacher. Easy to pass.”
MATH124A
“ !”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Recent online MATH245 reviews are strongly negative: rushed , and drops or near-fails.

Main concern

Rushed lectures, limited support, and .

What students said

“ ”
MATH245
“The ”
MATH245
“She does NOT offer partial credit, and makes excuses”
MATH245

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are high-stakes, often harder or .

Test HeavyExams Differ From HWIn-Person ExamsLittle Partial CreditFormula Sheets Not Enough

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

versus homework, and picky on notation.

In-Person ExamsTest HeavyNotation PickyFormula Sheets
“ . VERY picky on notation!”
MATH227
“ and tricky”
MATH227

Online

Online reviews describe rushed exams with many questions that and no partial credit.

Rushed Timed ExamsHW-Exam MismatchNo Partial Credit
“ and a disturbing number of questions that do not reflect the homework”
MATH245
“She does NOT offer partial credit”
MATH245

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you want an easy A but if you really want to .”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 reviews spanning 2016-2024, highlighting course-level and format splits. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She goes above and beyond to ensure everyone understands the concepts that she is teaching.”

📝

30/100

“The and HW.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“ , but not for Stats though.”

⚖️

32/100

“She does NOT offer partial credit, and makes excuses”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Shes a really good professor.
  • She makes the problem solving methods fun.
  • She rushes through her lectures
  • She jumbles her words, bounces from one thing to another.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • and tricky.
  • An easy A if you pay attention to her lectures
  • Lots of homework

Theme 3

❤️ About Character and Support

  • She's a caring professor and is willing to help
  • She makes you feel bad if you ask her too many questions.
  • Respected
  • ACCESSIBLE OUTSIDE CLASS

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

37 reviews across many years and courses, with , and course-level split.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH22714 reviews
MATH1126 reviews
MATH1134 reviews
MATH2453 reviews
MATH124A2 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH1672 reviews
MATH1141 review
MATH1251 review
MATH2211 review
MATH2241 review
MATH2401 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

30 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 2 · A 6

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 7 · Not sure yet 2