AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Zhengqing Ni

MATH227 · EDFN1092 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
40%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Avoid his MATH sections if you need a ; only consider EDFN if you can keep up from day one and use .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyTough graderSkip class? You won't passUnfair gradingExtra credit on some courses
  • MATH courses are test-heavy with and .
  • EDFN can feel fairer with and late work, but lectures are often taught by someone else and notes get messy.
  • and late joins get little catch-up support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

helps in EDFN, but , and several students report F, Incomplete, or dropping.

Online EDFN felt fairer; online and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty is mixed by course, but pace and alone suggest.

Online MATH is described as covering chapters extremely fast; in-person EDFN is lighter but confusing.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

One ; most other reviews treat it as required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

About 40 percent would take again, and negative MATH experiences outweigh the single strong EDFN endorsement.

; MATH online and in-person reviews strongly discourage.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Some late work and appear in EDFN, but tough-grader and .

Format shift

Online EDFN sounds more flexible; MATH reviews in .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students report lots of , and multi-chapter tests with little review.

Format shift

Workload complaints are strongest in in-person MATH227.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

A few students find him caring and , but many call lectures confusing, fast, or taught by someone else.

Format shift

Online EDFN is the main positive outlier; other formats lean negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

grade, with limited review and little curving.

Format shift

; online also tags test-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews emphasize confusing outsourced lectures, shifting grading, and .

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Test is 80% of your grade which is ridiculously high and .”
MATH227
“The else yet still very confusing.”
EDFN1092

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one EDFN student praises fairness and , while MATH227 online is described as fast, unforgiving, and incomplete-risk.

Main concern

Late enrollment and rapid chapter coverage with no catch-up path.

What students said

“He's a and is never cruel or ignores you when you have a question about the problems.”
EDFN1092
“Doesn't give you a chance to catch up even if you joined his class if you joined two days ago.”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and students say he does not curve.

Test heavyNo curveMulti-chapter examsHigh exam weight

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person MATH students say tests are 80 percent of the grade and uncurved.

80% test weightNo curveThree chapters per test
“Test is 80% of your grade which is ridiculously high and .”
MATH227

Online

Online MATH students report being forced into tests soon after late enrollment with little catch-up.

Test heavyNo catch-up for late joins
“ if you joined two days ago. Got an F because .”
MATH227

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Test is 80% of your grade which is ridiculously high and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews across Online and In person formats, highlighting MATH exam risk versus mixed EDFN fairness. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“overall a good professor. the only downside was that his lectures are taught by someone else so because they were not in order”

📉 Recommendation Risk

38/100

“ ”

📝

32/100

“Test is 80% of your grade which is ridiculously high and .”

👍 Fairness Outlier

70/100

“He's a and is never cruel or ignores you when you have a question about the problems.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and he's an overall caring professor.
  • Lectures were taught by someone .
  • Make sure if .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Test is 80% of your grade which is ridiculously high and .
  • There was so much workload that I dropped his course.
  • He gives out and lets you turn in late work, somewhat, of course.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Catch-Up Risk

  • Doesn't give you a chance to catch up even if you joined his class late
  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • The

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed reviews from 2020-2021 show consistent MATH risk and , but the sample is small and course-dependent.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

EDFN10923 reviews
MATH2272 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1