AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Roger Wolf

MATH240 · MATH · MATH121 · STAT227 · MATH112 · STATS227 · ELEMSTATISTICS · MATH272 · MATH230 · MATH1 · MATH3119 · MATH261 · MATH261CALC · MATH262 · MATH227 · MATH125 · MATH275 · MATH270 · 48 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can learn math from the textbook yourself; otherwise find a clearer lecturer.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnprepared LecturesSelf Study RequiredLots of HomeworkExtra CreditConfusing
  • Many students say lectures are unprepared, soft-spoken, and error-prone so .
  • Homework volume and a ; helps some sections.
  • A and , but overall recommendation is weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some get A with homework mastery and , but , and high fail rates.

Almost all evidence is in person; the one .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Calc and stats content plus unclear lectures make the class harder than the textbook alone.

Difficulty ; online sample is too small to compare content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; others say yes, so policy is inconsistent by course.

; in-person reports are mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

and most detailed comments urge finding another professor.

Online review is strongly negative; in-person opinions are mixed but lean negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Tests can be straightforward with partial credit and , but and harsh outcomes appear often.

Format shift

Online review says no curve even for 0.5%; and high fail rates.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of and .

Format shift

Both the online review and .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

book self-study.

Format shift

Online tech/communication issues; in-person winging lectures and soft speech.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

as supporting practice.

Format shift

In-person evidence is strongest; online also tags test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly in-person calculus/stats with , and .

Main concern

Unprepared lectures and hard or .

What students said

“Simply put, this man should not be teaching. He comes into class everyday ready to wing a lecture.”
MATH275
“Be prepared for a lot of self-study. The material itself is tough, but .”
MATH262
“When I was in his class 80 percent of the class failed.”
MATH227

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online MATH270 review , and .

Main concern

Technology friction and .

What students said

“Just because he has difficulties with technology he will simply say NO to anything you ask.”
MATH270

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

open-note quizzes or partial credit; not clearly open-book finals.

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and occasional open-note quizzes; finals sometimes flexible.

Book-Similar TestsPartial CreditExtra CreditOpen Notes Quiz
“ . Tests are graded fairly.”
MATH262
“ and if he does its open notes”
MATH1
“we asked as a and boy did he do it!”
MATH272

Online

One online review stresses tests and homework but .

Test HeavyLots of HomeworkNo Curve
“ and if you just need 0.5%.”
MATH270

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You really have to be prepared for math. I honestly did not understand anything. I taught myself out of the book.”

Voice snapshots generated from 48 reviews (1 online, 47 in person), highlighting key themes in lecture quality and self-study. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Lecture Clarity

32/100

“he comes into class everyday ready to wing a lecture.”

📚 Self Study Required

35/100

“I taught myself out of the book. .”

👍 When It Works

70/100

“Lots of homework but he gave u which definitely helps toward the .”

👎 Overall Recommendation

33/100

“ ! He shows up late. When I was in his class 80 percent of the class failed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes mathematics unbearable. The lectures are difficult to follow.
  • All he does is just stand there looks at the book and copies the books example
  • He is a good guy, always smile, will answer all of your questions, but

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Class average on the 2nd Exam was 33%. That was the AVERAGE.
  • , and .
  • Master the homework.

Theme 3

💻 Online Experience

  • Just because he has difficulties with technology he will simply say NO to anything you ask.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

48

Recent reviews read by the AI

48

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

48 reviews over many years with strong agreement that .

Inside 48 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 511
1 out of 519

Course coverage

MATH2279 reviews
MATH2627 reviews
MATH1214 reviews
MATH3 reviews
MATH13 reviews
Show 14 more courses
MATH2403 reviews
MATH2703 reviews
MATH1252 reviews
MATH2612 reviews
MATH2752 reviews
STAT2272 reviews
1211 review
ELEMSTATISTICS1 review
MATH1121 review
MATH2301 review
MATH261CALC1 review
MATH2721 review
MATH31191 review
STATS2271 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

18 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 3 · A 5

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1