AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Angela Wayne

MATH121 · MATH167 · C0829 · MATH115 · MTH110 · WAYNE88613 · MATH110 · MATH227 · MATH19732 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
68.42%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you show up, do the homework, and want a likable stats teacher who rewards effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious and caringExcel-based stats teachingMandatory attendanceExtra credit boostsClear when she clicks
  • Most , and supportive in stats and lower math.
  • Attendance is effectively mandatory and .
  • A minority say she relies on Excel and self-study and is hard to understand.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

and homework-aligned tests help, but stats still takes real work and grades range from A+ .

Online evidence is one supportive C+ review; most .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content difficulty sits around mid-level stats with Excel shortcuts that ease calculation but not concepts.

Both formats describe non-trivial stats; online was still rated difficulty 4.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

and tags warn that skipping means you will not pass.

Online and as required.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but critics warn weak explanation and self-teaching.

The single online review is strongly positive; in-person opinion is split but mostly favorable.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and help, yet tough-grader and unfinished-test complaints keep it only moderately lenient.

Format shift

Leniency comments .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and important, with some calling it a lot, but many say it is doable and .

Format shift

Workload comments come mainly from in-person MATH courses.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Majority praise clear, funny, caring lectures, offset by sharp critiques of Excel focus, accent, and .

Format shift

Online review is glowing; 1-2 ratings.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Students repeatedly call the class test-heavy, though .

Format shift

Assessment pattern described mostly for in-person stats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person, many call her cute, funny, and and , while a vocal minority say you teach yourself and struggle with tests or her delivery.

Main concern

, and uneven lecture clarity frustrate some students.

What students said

“ .”
MATH227
“Prepare to learn on your own because this professor is absolutely awful.”
MATH227
“You'll pass as long as .”
MATH167

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One COVID-era online MATH227 , and strong support to help students pass.

Main concern

and the class remained challenging despite recordings.

What students said

“She taught great online she recorded her classes so incase you couldnt be in class there would be a video”
MATH227

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often mirror homework and Excel steps, but timing pressure and .

Homework-like testsTimed examsExtra creditExcel-based problems

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; some students never finish on time and report tough grading.

Homework-like testsTimed examsTest heavy
“ .”
MATH227
“My one complaint was test time since I never finished on time.”
MATH227

Online

Online review does not clearly describe exam proctoring or format beyond overall support to pass.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She wants every single student to understand the material and if you .”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 reviews, highlighting teaching personality, homework-test alignment, and . Credibility rating: High.

😄 Personality Wins Fans

72/100

“She is so funny and happy and likable. Made me want to work harder than I ever have in a math class.”

📝

58/100

“DO THE HOMEWORK!! .”

⚠️

35/100

“Prepare to learn on your own because this professor is absolutely awful.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . lots of chances for feed back
  • so !
  • she teaches shortcuts in excel which is useful

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • If she sees that you put in the effort, you'll pass
  • She gives easy that could boost your grade
  • Stats is hard,but shes prob the

Theme 3

⚠️ About Criticisms

  • Doesn't seem to know her material thoroughly
  • her accent is hard to undestand so i will not recomend her
  • I passed becasue I taught myself with the textbook.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen detailed reviews across several years and courses show consistent themes with mixed but rich evidence.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH2279 reviews
MATH1102 reviews
MATH1212 reviews
C08291 review
MATH1151 review
Show 4 more courses
MATH1671 review
MATH197321 review
MTH1101 review
WAYNE886131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

4

C+ 3 · C 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2