AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Luis Zambrano

MATN115 · MATH0863 · MATH229 · STAT227 · MATH112 · STATS227 · MATH105 · MATH115 · GEOMETRY · MATHEMATICS115 · MATH299 · STAT235 · STAT1 · MATTH1234 · MATH227 · MATH125 · STATS · 54 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you will do the homework and ; be ready for a serious demeanor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardMath made easyDo the homeworkDrops lowest testIntimidating at timesBest at LACC
  • Majority call him the best math or stats teacher at LACC .
  • Doing and ; tests track HW and notes.
  • A vocal minority finds him rude, intimidating, or unhelpful, and some classes thin out.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Many say do the homework and you get an A; tests mirror HW and practice exams, though stats can still feel hard.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

He breaks math into simple terms so content feels easier than typical math, but the subject still challenges some.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Students report and he .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

89/100

Overwhelming praise as strongly advise against him.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

72/100

; little and pure test focus for some sections.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

and frequent enough to drive success, but not described as overwhelming busywork.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

, and real learning gains; some report impatience or .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

; and may not always count as points.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and stats instruction where homework drives test success, with a minority reporting intimidation.

Main concern

Some students find him rude or hard to approach and .

What students said

“ ! ... DO YOUR HW! THATS IT! .”
STAT227
“Just DO and UNDERSTAND the .”
MATH227
“doesn't grade on attendence yeah!”
MATH115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Standard in-person tests that and study guides, often with .

Tests based on homeworkPractice examsDrop lowest testIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes; practice exams and a dropped lowest test are commonly mentioned.

HW-based testsPractice examsDrop worst test before finalNo strong proctoring details
“ if not similar to the .”
MATH227
“ and final. and notes.”
STAT1
“ .”
STAT227

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just DO and UNDERSTAND the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 , and polarization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“THIS TEACHER MADE ME LIKE PROBLEM SOLVING. HE IS HANDS DOWN THE !!”

🅰️ Path to an A

78/100

“DO YOUR HW! THATS IT! .”

📅

88/100

“ .”

⚠️ Polarizing Style

45/100

“he's RUDE, intimidating,unhelpful,moody,& not a good explainer.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He breaks things down in simple terms
  • makes math easy
  • and explanations

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just DO and UNDERSTAND the

Theme 3

⚡ About Personality

  • fun, easy to talk to when help needed
  • can be grumpy and intimidating
  • He's a jerk when he wants to be, but he's easy going.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

54

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 in-person reviews with rich detail and a and older dates.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 57
3 out of 57
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH11516 reviews
MATH2279 reviews
STAT2275 reviews
STATS2275 reviews
MATH1052 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH1122 reviews
GEOMETRY1 review
MATH08631 review
MATH1251 review
MATH2291 review
MATH2991 review
MATHEMATICS1151 review
MATN1151 review
MATTH12341 review
STAT11 review
STAT2351 review
STATS1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values