AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

R Mardirosian~2/9/10

MATH261 · MATH121 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

and find a clearer math instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplanationsUnprepared TestsDrop ImmediatelyFlirting Over TeachingHard Math
  • Students and fails to teach effectively
  • Tests include problems never covered in class
  • Both reviews urge switching to another instructor

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

High difficulty and , not classroom teaching.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Calculus and related math feel hard and students say he does not make the content clearer.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Both reviewers discourage taking him and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tests reportedly include untaught problems, which students experience as harsh assessment.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Hard class plus weak .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Comments say he , and is inefficient as an instructor.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

Students mainly criticize tests that do not match what was taught in class.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and misaligned with tests.

Main concern

Material is not explained well and .

What students said

“This guy doesn't teach anything he's just there to flirt.”
MATH121
“ and his tests are madeup of problems he never showed how to do.”
MATH261

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are described as hard and full of problems never shown in class.

Uncovered Test ProblemsTextbook RequiredIn-Person Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests reportedly include problems he never demonstrated how to solve.

Uncovered Test ProblemsTextbook Required
“ how to do”
MATH261
“He doesnt if you're in ”
MATH121

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if you're in and go to a more efficient teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching and misaligned tests. Credibility rating: Low.

🚫 Teaching Quality

15/100

“This guy doesn't teach anything he's just there to flirt.”

📉

25/100

“ how to do”

👎 Recommendation

12/100

“ and go to a more efficient teacher.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesn't teach anything
  • his teaching is lacking

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • how to do
  • Calculus is a hard class and he doesn't really make it any easier
  • The book was terrible too

Theme 3

⚠️ About Class Experience

  • He's a cool guy, but his teaching is lacking
  • if you're in

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Only two old reviews exist, both negative and consistent, but the sample is too small for high confidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1211 review
MATH2611 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values