AI Rate Professor

History

Brian Miller

SJS003 · HIS020 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Worth considering for online history if you do the assigned work, but the small sample .

Best fit · Effort For RewardUnderstanding and FlexibleQuick Email RepliesOrganized Online CoursesMixed In-Person ToneFair Feedback
  • Three of four reviews are , and organization.
  • and not understanding.
  • Online HIS020 is described as easy enough with real learning if you complete the work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Reported grades are high and one student said little effort still produced learning and success if work was done.

Ease evidence is strongest in online HIS020; - and A+.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

History and social-justice courses are described as manageable with assigned work rather than conceptually brutal.

Both formats describe moderate difficulty around 2-3.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and participation; another says attendance was not mandatory.

In-person HIS020 mandatory; SJS003 optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most reviewers would take him again and praise support, but .

Online reviews are positive; in-person is split one-to-one.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students mention , and constructive feedback.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in the positive in-person and online reviews; the negative review does not detail harsh scoring.

Workload

Light

72/100

Comments suggest doable assigned work without overwhelming load when students stay current.

Format shift

Online student explicitly reported low effort still worked; little workload detail in the negative review.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and care in most reviews are offset by one report of condescending tone.

Format shift

Online teaching praised as inspiring and efficient; in-person quality is inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Comments center on completed assignments, discussions, and .

Format shift

No detailed exam policy in any review; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Depends

one calls him the best and highly flexible; another found him condescending and .

Main concern

Conflicting personality and tone reports make in-person fit unpredictable.

What students said

“ . Had issues mid sem personally, and ”
SJS003
“ and can be very condescending. ”
HIS020

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online HIS020 , and solid learning without extreme effort.

Main concern

Only two online reviews, so format confidence stays limited.

What students said

“ and efficient. He's quick to respond to questions, made constructive comments on completed assignments.”
HIS020
“Didn't really feel like I put a whole lot of effort in it and actually learned along the way.”
HIS020

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam security or format; .

Assignment FocusedConstructive Feedback

Assessment risk

Standard

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews focus on participation, late work, and .

Participation MattersLate Work Flexibility
“He gave students opportunities at the end of the sem, for some credit as well.”
SJS003

Online

and but do not prove proctoring or open-book exam rules.

Fair GradingQuick Feedback
“He grades fairly and you'll do great if you do the work assigned.”
HIS020

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've taken many online classes but this was one of the best. and efficient. Fantastic class!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews with split online and in-person evidence. Credibility rating: Low.

⭐ Teaching Quality

74/100

“ , and !”

👍 Recommendation Split

72/100

“ .”

⚠️ Tone Concern

40/100

“ and can be very condescending. ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and efficient
  • Amazing lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Didn't really feel like I put a whole lot of effort in it
  • you'll do great if you do the work assigned
  • able to give me credit for late assignments

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • very understanding
  • can be very condescending

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews over several years with mixed in-person tone limit reliability despite detailed comments.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIS0203 reviews
SJS0031 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values