AI Rate Professor

Art

Mitra Fabian

3DDESIGN · ART067B · SCULPTURE · CERAMICS001 · ART085A · ART067A · CERAMICS065A · ART065 · ART85A · ART81 · ART065C · ART088A · 28 lifetime ratings

AI rating
61/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
78.26%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and career-level standards, not if you need a low-effort studio elective.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough But Insightful CritiquesLong Lecture Heavy StudioCareer-Minded Art MentorProject And Notebook DrivenStrict Attendance Expectation
  • Serious art and ceramics students often grow a lot from her critiques and high standards.
  • Recent 3D design and sculpture reviews complain , and limited work time.
  • She is not an easy A and expects real studio effort plus documentation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Multiple students say she is not an easy A and and notebooks more strictly than other art professors.

All evidence is in person.

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

, but , and critiques keep the course demanding.

All evidence is in person; ceramics often feels more supportive than advanced 3D or sculpture.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and skipping hurts both progress and grading.

All evidence is in person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

Passionate art students recommend her for growth, while recent .

All evidence is in person, with older ceramics praise outweighing but not erasing recent complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

She is widely called a and grades notebooks and projects rigorously.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Workload

Heavy

36/100

Complex projects, long lectures, and semester notebooks require substantial outside studio time.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Many call her inspiring and technically strong, while others say lectures ramble and .

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and notebooks rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

All evidence is in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person studio classes reward serious makers with strong critiques, but long lectures and .

Main concern

Two-hour lectures can leave little in-class work time and late work or .

What students said

“Mitra is super cool, gives great feedback, cares about your work, and pushes .”
ART088A
“Mitra expects students to get extremely complicated and but lectures for 2+ hours giving no time to work on them.”
SCULPTURE
“Amazing artist, horrible professor. Beneficial critiques.”
ART81

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is critique- and project-based with notebooks and demos rather than formal proctored exams.

Project CritiquesStudio ProjectsNotebook DocumentationIn-Class Demos

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and notebook consistency rather than written exams.

Project CritiquesNotebooksStudio Projects
“DO NOT FALL BEHIND ON HER NOTEBOOK.”
ART065C
“Beneficial critiques. If you make something subpar, she will let you know its bad.”
ART81
“You will, on the other hand, get good critiques.”
SCULPTURE

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Mitra is definitely not going to let you get an easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 28 in-person reviews, highlighting growth-focused praise and workload or . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Mitra is genuinely one of the career as a student!”

👍 Recommendation Split

70/100

“She's especially great for students pursuing a degree or career in art.”

⚖️

32/100

“She is not an and will give you the grade you deserve based on your work.”

⏱️ Lecture Vs Studio Time

30/100

“lectures for 2+ hours giving no time to work on them.”

Theme 1

🎨 About Studio Teaching

  • I loved ceramics with Mitra! Learned a lot from her. Cool projects.
  • She helps solidify my desire to persue art.
  • She teaches you basics so well, that you are not afraid to delve into experimentation fearlessly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Mitra is definitely not going to let you get an easy A.
  • she grades a little tougher than other art professors I've had
  • !!!!

Theme 3

🗣️ And Critiques

  • , and pushes .
  • Beneficial critiques.
  • Great critiques. Great challenging in class tasks.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

28

Recent reviews read by the AI

28

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-eight reviews over many years show a durable pattern of high standards, with a recent uptick in negative 3D and sculpture feedback.

Inside 28 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

CERAMICS0016 reviews
3DDESIGN4 reviews
ART065C4 reviews
SCULPTURE3 reviews
ART0652 reviews
Show 7 more courses
ART088A2 reviews
ART812 reviews
ART067A1 review
ART067B1 review
ART085A1 review
ART85A1 review
CERAMICS065A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

21 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 4 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 2