AI Rate Professor

Oceanography

Jagruti Vedamati

OCEA010 · ASTRO10 · OCEAN010 · PHYSC012 · ASTRO10L · ENVS23 · ASTR1 · PHSY012 · GEOL010 · OCEAN01 · PHYS012 · ASTRO01 · OCEA10 · ASTR1702 · OCEAN10 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
80.43%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want an engaged science teacher and will work for the grade; avoid if you need an easy GE or slow-paced lectures.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPassionate LecturerParticipation MattersGroup Project HeavyWork For Your GradeCaring but Demanding
  • and real care for learning oceanography, physics, and astronomy.
  • Expect , and group projects; grades reward effort more than .
  • A , and test-heavy stress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students say she makes you work for it with , and tests; easy A is not the norm.

In-person and online both stress effort; a .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

but paced as a real science course, not a free elective.

Difficulty ratings cluster around moderate-to-hard across formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly required, with .

; a few older sections were more flexible.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

About four in , and support despite a vocal minority of .

online no-response stories.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

, but tough-grader and , so leniency is moderate not free.

Format shift

Online grade visibility delays and .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

, and regular class work keep the load substantial.

Format shift

and in-person critical reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Dominant theme is clear, passionate, caring teaching with .

Format shift

In-person lectures get stronger praise; online clarity and responsiveness are more mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Mix of homework, projects, participation, and .

Format shift

Some reviews flag test-heavy sections, especially when study guides are missing.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person majority describe organized, hands-on, inspirational classes with if you stay active.

Main concern

Workload and disciplinary tone can feel heavy for students seeking a low-effort science elective.

What students said

“ and is very thorough. Her passion is very evident in the way she teaches.”
OCEA010
“Just straight up plain awful. Her lectures are extremely hard to listen to & they dump an enormous amount of information on you at once.”
OCEA010

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online feedback splits between caring, flexible pandemic-era sections and harsh reports of , and withdrawals.

Main concern

Some online students say she is hard to reach and dumps too much information at once.

What students said

“ and . Highly recommend to take her class.”
ASTR1
“I reached out to her for help, absolutely no response whatsoever.”
ASTR1702

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams matter in several sections, but comments ; overall risk is standard college science.

Test Heavy in Some SectionsPop Quizzes PossibleProject and Lab ComponentsNo Clear Proctoring Details

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group projects; some students wanted clearer study guides.

Exams Without Study Guides SometimesGroup ProjectsIn-Class Assignments
“ . No study guides for exams.”
PHYSC012
“We had a great time making the group project and loved all the in class assignments.”
OCEA010

Online

and mismatched test material more than specific proctoring tools.

Pop QuizzesHomework-Test Mismatch Reports
“ , lectures are throw so much info at once”
ASTR1702
“This class was my hardest class.”
ASTR1

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Looking to learn Oceanography..this is where you need to be.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews (8 online, 38 in person), highlighting passion, workload, and split online support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Ms. and very understandable.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

80/100

“ ”

💪 Effort Required

42/100

“She makes sure you work for it. Be involved and active in her class and you are bound to do well.”

⚠️ Polarizing Moments

30/100

“Everyone has an issue with her in the class, I say run.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Loved her lectures and .
  • She is sincere and dedicated
  • Her lectures are extremely hard to listen to

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Very supportive professor
  • Friendly and warm

Theme 3

📈 About Work and Grades

  • Be prepared to work though, .
  • Good for a good grade
  • She will make you work for it.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

46 detailed reviews across many courses and years, with a .

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 526
4 out of 511
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENVS238 reviews
OCEAN0108 reviews
PHYS0126 reviews
ASTRO10L5 reviews
OCEA0105 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ASTR13 reviews
ASTRO102 reviews
PHYSC0122 reviews
ASTR17021 review
ASTRO011 review
GEOL0101 review
OCEA101 review
OCEAN011 review
OCEAN101 review
PHSY0121 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 3

B range

3

B+ 1 · B- 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 4