AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Medha Bodas

MATH010 · MATH004C · MATH4A · MATH3B · MATH012 · MATH42 · MATH03B · MATH004A · MATH10 · MATH000D · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
21/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
19.57%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

expect , and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh graderImpossible timed testsHeavy homeworkFast confusing lecturesAvoid if possible
  • and and tests.
  • Timed exams often feel unfinished even for strong students.
  • grind for most students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

16/100

Even dedicated students report , and ; an A requires exceptional effort and luck.

Online async reviews ; in person a few still earn A with heavy work.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

Content pace, volume of homework, and math experiences students report.

Both formats are hard; .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

Many ; many in-person sections require attendance and .

; in-person more often mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

and most recent voices say sign up early for anyone else.

A minority of in-person and older reviews find her caring or effective; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

14/100

Students repeatedly say large point cuts for , and little flexibility.

Format shift

Online grading complaints are loudest; but .

Workload

Overwhelming

22/100

midterms, and heavy study time are common.

Format shift

Online ; in person still has nightly HW and frequent quizzes.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many call lectures too fast or unclear; a smaller group , and teaches well if you keep up.

Format shift

Online async teaching quality is rated especially low; in-person opinions are more mixed but still often negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Quizzes and ; but often low weight.

Format shift

Both formats are quiz and test heavy; exam.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person stats and calc , and harshly graded; a minority praise humor and office hours if you work hard.

Main concern

, and many drops.

What students said

“ and grades SUPER HARSHLY.”
Math004C
“Horrible professor, bad at explaining the material and I am so glad I dropped her for another teacher”
MATH010
“SUPER HARD CLASS!! she gives you the last 20 minutes of class to finish a 1 hour exam.”
MATH10

Remote format

Online

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online or async Math004C and similar courses are described as , and nearly impossible timed tests.

Main concern

, and exams too long for the time given.

What students said

“ , UNLESS MASOCHISTIC!!!!!”
Math004C
“ , and her tests are honestly so unrealistic.”
Math004C
“Almost 5 homework assignments due every week, some homework have 20-30 questions in it.”
Math004C

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are widely described as unrealistically timed and graded very strictly for minor mistakes.

Harsh timed testsNot enough timeQuiz heavyHarder than homeworkStrict point deductions

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and sometimes given with too little class time; some quizzes are open note but .

Hard in-person examsFrequent quizzesOpen-note quizzes in some sections
“she gives you the last 20 minutes of class to finish a 1 hour exam.”
MATH10
“ . .”
Math42

Online

Online timed assessments feel unfinished and harshly scored; reviews .

Unrealistic timed testsHarsh online quiz gradingHeavy MyOpenMath HW
“the .”
Math004C
“Does not give nearly enough time to complete the exams.”
MATH000D

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , UNLESS MASOCHISTIC!!!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (22 online, 28 in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Horrible professor, bad at explaining the material and I am so glad I dropped her for another teacher”

⚖️

14/100

“ and grades SUPER HARSHLY.”

⏱️

16/100

“You need superhuman speed in order to ”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“SIGN UP EARLIER AND DO NOT SIGN UP FOR BODAS!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She goes way too fast in her lectures
  • Lecture notes are a mess.
  • Hilariously bad at teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • by far this class has been the HARDEST I HAVE EVER TAKEN.
  • .
  • This is the .

Theme 3

❤️ Minority Positive Notes

  • .
  • She really cares about the class but sets the bar at about what I would expect at a 4 year University.
  • Really funny and cares about her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years with and difficulty, despite a minority of positive outliers.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 58
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 532

Course coverage

Math004C20 reviews
MATH01010 reviews
MATH106 reviews
MATH3B5 reviews
MATH4A3 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH000D2 reviews
MATH004A1 review
MATH0121 review
MATH03B1 review
Math421 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

13

A 11 · A- 2

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

3

C+ 1 · C 2

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

20

Drop/Withdrawal 6 · Incomplete 3 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 2