AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Viet Nguyen

MATH106 · MATH4C · MATH106R · MATH010 · MATH4B · 4C · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
46.15%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if and thrive in a test-heavy lecture class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyThick accentPartial creditStudy guidesPolarizing
  • and fair tests, others report confusion and hostility
  • and study guides for successful students
  • Online MATH106 reviews are especially harsh on teaching alignment and support

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

As are possible with study guides and partial credit, but and many report hard work.

Online sections report harder, less aligned tests than many in-person MATH4B comments.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Average difficulty around mid-range, with content manageable if .

Online MATH106 comments describe .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Some sections mark attendance optional while others require showing up and .

Online .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

46/100

About half would take again; praise and .

Recent online reviews trend more negative than older positive in-person comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Partial credit and help some students, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

Online MATH106 reports .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Homework is often about 20 questions weekly; the and self-study.

Format shift

Workload complaints are stronger in online MATH106 than in many in-person sections.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students find lectures clear and approachable; others say he reads notes, rejects questions, or is hard to understand.

Format shift

Online reviews and tone.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Repeated test-heavy structure with , and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person MATH4B experiences range from strong partial-credit and inflexibility.

Main concern

Lecture clarity and interpersonal tone vary widely by section and student.

What students said

“Just reads from lecture notes and .”
MATH4B
“Gives lots of .”
MATH4B
“I would highly recommend taking a different teacher for elementary statistics.”
MATH010

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online sections are mixed but skew more negative, with , and low support.

Main concern

Tests and ; some students report being laughed at when asking questions.

What students said

“when it came to the tests and the work you have to do, it had absolutely nothing to do with what he taught you.”
MATH106
“ ”
MATH106
“Just attend class and do textbook problems and you'll be fine.”
MATH4B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; friendly study guides and partial credit appear for some courses, while others feel misaligned and strict.

Test heavyStudy guidesPartial creditTextbook-style questions

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments often mention study guides, fair textbook-like questions, and partial credit, with limited proctoring detail.

Study guidesPartial creditIn-person midterms and final
“He provides accurate study guides for and HW is easy to do.”
MATH4B
“ and are fair (no trick questions).”
MATH4B

Online

and poor lecture-test alignment; proctoring tools are not clearly described.

Test heavyMisaligned examsExtra credit on some tests
“Expects you to do questions on the is on the homework or what is on the examples in class.”
4C
“He as well, and gives good partial credit.”
MATH4B

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are willing to work hard, Professor Nguyen is a great professor for you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews across online and and test focus. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Teaching

48/100

“The .”

📝

60/100

“Gives lots of .”

📚

40/100

“Just read textbook/watch videos for deeper understanding.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Just reads from lecture notes and
  • thick accent was extremely sloppy hand writing

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • us an in-depth study guide
  • credit for showing work
  • Gives lots of

Theme 3

⚠️ About Tone

  • Doesn't like questions
  • Laughed at students incorrect answers during lectures
  • I don't make mistakes; I've been teaching this course for 20 years

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across years and formats with both strong praise and strong criticism yield solid but mixed evidence.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH4B4 reviews
MATH1063 reviews
4C2 reviews
MATH4C2 reviews
MATH0101 review
Show 1 more courses
MATH106R1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1