AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Wagner

ENG1A · ENGLISH1A · 1A · ENG001C · ENGL10 · ENGLI905 · ENG11C · ENG41 · ENGL1C · ENGC1000 · ENGIC · ENGL905 · ENGL1B · E1A · ENG1 · ENGLISH1C · ENGL041 · ISTU40 · ENGB1 · ENGLISH1B · ENGAENG1 · ENGAENGA · ENG1B · ISTU040 · ENG1C · 104 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a tough English grind and are ready for heavy essays and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy Essay WorkloadEnergetic LecturerMLA SticklerGroup Projects
  • and high word-count demands dominate the experience
  • Attendance and participation often count heavily toward the grade
  • Students who put in serious effort often praise her energy and

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting an A usually and heavy work, not light effort.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

, and fast-moving projects make the content feel demanding for many students.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is mandatory or a big part of the grade, and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Low take-again rate and the challenge.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

and MLA details.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Lots of , and group work appear across many courses.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Energetic and helpful for engaged students, but others find lectures unfocused or confusing.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Essays, journals, projects, and participation drive the .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and very strict essay grading; energy and help are real if you show up and work.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ ”
ENG1A
“ ”
ENGLISH1C
“she doesn't even grade hard whatsoever but clearly people rating her don't do anything”
ENGC1000

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mainly essays and written work rather than clearly described proctored exams.

Essay-heavy assessmentHigh word-count papersMLA focus

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews emphasize long essays, journals, and .

Essay-heavy assessmentHigh word-count papersMLA focus
“writing logs and ”
ENGLISH1C
“Asks for insanely ”
ENGL1B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you like classes where everyone is supposed to act all buddy buddy, take her. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person reviews, highlighting grading, workload, and teaching tone. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️

24/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Load

26/100

“Ridiculous amount of work assigned every class”

👍 Teaching Upside

55/100

“She's skilled, funny, chooses engaging materials and cares a lot”

🔁 Recommendation Split

36/100

“I DO NOT SUGGEST TAKING THIS CLASS”

Theme 1

📝 About Essays and Grades

  • She's a
  • almost impossible to get a good grade on
  • because you have to meet a certain word count

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her energetic behavior makes her classes fun
  • talk endlessly without ever getting to the point
  • very thorough and expected nothing but the best

Theme 3

⏰ and Work

  • Lots of homework
  • Skip class? You won't pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

104

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews spanning many years with and workload support a high credibility rating.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 543
4 out of 524
3 out of 57
2 out of 520
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG1A7 reviews
ENG1C7 reviews
ENGL1B5 reviews
ENG1B4 reviews
ENGL1C3 reviews
Show 20 more courses
ENGLISH1C3 reviews
ENGL9052 reviews
ENGLISH1A2 reviews
1A1 review
E1A1 review
ENG001C1 review
ENG11 review
ENG11C1 review
ENG411 review
ENGAENG11 review
ENGAENGA1 review
ENGB11 review
ENGC10001 review
ENGIC1 review
ENGL0411 review
ENGL101 review
ENGLI9051 review
ENGLISH1B1 review
ISTU0401 review
ISTU401 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Audit/No Grade 1 · Rather not say 1